Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
HYLN vs WKHS vs PLUG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
Electrical Equipment & Parts
HYLN vs WKHS vs PLUG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Manufacturers | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $464M | $32M | $4.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $11M | $710M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-57M | $-64M | $-1.63B |
| Gross Margin | 4.9% | -236.8% | 99.8% |
| Operating Margin | -18.9% | -5.6% | 38.1% |
| Total Debt | $4M | $16M | $997M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $4M | $1M |
HYLN vs WKHS vs PLUG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyliion Holdings Co… (HYLN) | 100 | 24.7 | -75.3% |
| Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HYLN vs WKHS vs PLUG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HYLN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 130.3%, EPS growth -10.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.39, Low D/E 2.3%, current ratio 10.00x
- Beta 2.39, current ratio 10.00x
WKHS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- beta 1.46
- Beta 1.46 vs PLUG's 2.57, lower leverage
PLUG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 62.2% 10Y total return vs HYLN's -74.5%
- -229.8% margin vs HYLN's -16.5%
- +303.6% vs HYLN's +52.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 130.3% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -229.8% margin vs HYLN's -16.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.46 vs PLUG's 2.57, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +303.6% vs HYLN's +52.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -28.1% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC -23.7% vs 10.9% |
HYLN vs WKHS vs PLUG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HYLN vs WKHS vs PLUG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLUG leads in 1 of 6 categories
WKHS leads 1 • HYLN leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLUG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLUG is the larger business by revenue, generating $710M annually — 204.3x HYLN's $3M. PLUG is the more profitable business, keeping -2.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HYLN's -16.5%. On growth, PLUG holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $11M | $710M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$60M | -$52M | -$1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$57M | -$64M | -$1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$70M | -$33M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | -2.4% | +99.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.9% | -5.6% | +38.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.5% | -6.1% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.2% | -3.1% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -52.8% | -5.0% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | +95.9% | +95.9% |
Valuation Metrics
WKHS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $464M | $32M | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $445M | $44M | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.48x | -0.07x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 133.54x | 4.83x | 6.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.26x | 0.16x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HYLN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HYLN delivers a -29.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-30 in annual profit, vs $-198 for WKHS. HYLN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLUG scores 5/9 vs WKHS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.8% | -198.1% | -124.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.1% | -60.6% | -64.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -23.7% | -77.6% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.6% | -107.9% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.37x | 19.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | $12M | $996M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $4M | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $16M | $997M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.84x | -36.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HYLN and PLUG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HYLN five years ago would be worth $2,708 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15 for WKHS. Over the past 12 months, PLUG leads with a +303.6% total return vs HYLN's +52.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HYLN at 12.0% vs WKHS's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.7% | -34.7% | +40.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.5% | +236.1% | +303.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.3% | -98.6% | -66.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.9% | -99.8% | -86.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.5% | -99.8% | +62.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.0% | -75.9% | -30.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HYLN and WKHS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WKHS is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLUG's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HYLN currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs WKHS's 30.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.39x | 1.46x | 2.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.56 | $11.80 | $4.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.11 | $0.53 | $0.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +30.8% | +68.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.4 | 72.7 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 949K | 167K | 76.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HYLN as "Hold", PLUG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.7% upside for HYLN (target: $3) vs 24.9% for PLUG (target: $4).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.13 | — | $3.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | — | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
PLUG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). WKHS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HYLN vs WKHS vs PLUG: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HYLN or WKHS or PLUG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hyliion Holdings Corp.
(HYLN) is the stronger pick with 130. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Analysts rate Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HYLN or WKHS or PLUG?
Over the past 5 years, Hyliion Holdings Corp.
(HYLN) delivered a total return of -72. 9%, compared to -99. 8% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLUG returned +62. 2% versus WKHS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HYLN or WKHS or PLUG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Workhorse Group Inc.
(WKHS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 46β versus Plug Power Inc. 's 2. 57β — meaning PLUG is approximately 76% more volatile than WKHS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hyliion Holdings Corp. (HYLN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HYLN or WKHS or PLUG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hyliion Holdings Corp.
(HYLN) is pulling ahead at 130. 3% versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -10. 0% for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HYLN leads at 18. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HYLN or WKHS or PLUG?
Plug Power Inc.
(PLUG) is the more profitable company, earning -229. 8% net margin versus -1645. 7% for Hyliion Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps -229. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -1886. 4% for HYLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HYLN or WKHS or PLUG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is HYLN or WKHS or PLUG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Workhorse Group Inc.
(WKHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Hyliion Holdings Corp. (HYLN) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WKHS: -99. 8%, HYLN: -74. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HYLN and WKHS and PLUG?
These companies operate in different sectors (HYLN (Consumer Cyclical) and WKHS (Consumer Cyclical) and PLUG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HYLN is a small-cap high-growth stock; WKHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare PLUG vs BE
BE is one of the most direct listed alternatives to PLUG.
Compare WKHS vs RIVN
RIVN overlaps with WKHS in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With BE + FCEL
BE and FCEL are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.