IAG vs PAAS

For growth investors, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is the stronger pick with 77.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 30. 6% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is the cheapest at 15.

9x versus Pan American Silver Corp. at 21. 7x. On forward P/E, IAMGOLD Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IAMGOLD Corporation wins at 0. 12x versus Pan American Silver Corp. 's 0. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) delivered a total return of +467.

5%, compared to +69. 1% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAG returned +405. 5% versus PAAS's +293. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus IAMGOLD Corporation's 0. 93β — meaning IAG is approximately 26% more volatile than PAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 20% for IAMGOLD Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is pulling ahead at 77.

8% versus 30. 6% for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pan American Silver Corp. grew EPS 741. 9% year-over-year, compared to -22. 7% for IAMGOLD Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, IAG leads at 44. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 0% net margin versus 23. 3% for IAMGOLD Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IAG leads at 38. 9% versus 32. 3% for PAAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IAG leads at 41. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Pan American Silver Corp. 's 0. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for Pan American Silver Corp. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IAG: 59. 5% to $29. 50.

In this comparison, PAAS (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. IAG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 8% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAAS: +293. 8%, IAG: +405. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

PAAS pays a dividend while IAG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.