Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ICG vs CANF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ICG vs CANF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $84M | $25M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $310M | $560K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $-9M |
| Gross Margin | 47.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | -16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 2.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $272K | $104K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $322M | $5M |
ICG vs CANF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intchains Group Lim… (ICG) | 100 | 15.6 | -84.4% |
| Can-Fite BioPharma … (CANF) | 100 | 152.4 | +52.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ICG vs CANF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ICG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 242.7%, EPS growth 490.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -23.6%
- -83.5% 10Y total return vs CANF's -99.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.84, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 9.43x
CANF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.88
- Beta 0.88, current ratio 4.38x
- Beta 0.88 vs ICG's 1.84
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 242.7% revenue growth vs CANF's -9.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs CANF's -15.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs ICG's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +220.2% vs ICG's -39.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.9% ROA vs CANF's -114.0%, ROIC 0.4% vs -448.3% |
ICG vs CANF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ICG vs CANF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICG is the larger business by revenue, generating $310M annually — 553.7x CANF's $560,000. ICG is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CANF's -15.7%. On growth, CANF holds the edge at -36.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $310M | $560,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$306,250 | -$9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$28M | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.0% | +100.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | -16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | -15.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | -14.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.9% | -36.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | +36.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ICG leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84M | $25M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $37M | $21M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.23x | -3.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.87x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.19x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.04x | 37.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.27x | 4.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ICG delivers a 2.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CANF. ICG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CANF's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICG scores 6/9 vs CANF's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.0% | -2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | -114.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.4% | -4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | -108.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$322M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $322M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $272,000 | $104,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 56.36x | -580.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CANF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANF five years ago would be worth $1,754 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,650 for ICG. Over the past 12 months, CANF leads with a +220.2% total return vs ICG's -39.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CANF at 19.3% vs ICG's -46.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.4% | +1486.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.2% | +220.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.5% | +69.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.5% | -82.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.5% | -99.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.3% | +19.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICG and CANF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CANF is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICG's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICG currently trades 39.5% from its 52-week high vs CANF's 33.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.34 | $10.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.93 | $0.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.5% | +33.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 65.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 434K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ICG as "Buy" and CANF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 203.0% upside for ICG (target: $4) vs 107.7% for CANF (target: $7).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.00 | $7.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ICG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CANF leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ICG vs CANF: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ICG or CANF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intchains Group Limited (ICG) is the stronger pick with 242.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd. (CANF). Intchains Group Limited (ICG) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (2. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intchains Group Limited (ICG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ICG or CANF?
Over the past 5 years, Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd.
(CANF) delivered a total return of -82. 5%, compared to -83. 5% for Intchains Group Limited (ICG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICG returned -83. 5% versus CANF's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ICG or CANF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd.
(CANF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 88β versus Intchains Group Limited's 1. 84β — meaning ICG is approximately 109% more volatile than CANF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intchains Group Limited (ICG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ICG or CANF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intchains Group Limited (ICG) is pulling ahead at 242.
7% versus -9. 3% for Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd. (CANF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intchains Group Limited grew EPS 490. 9% year-over-year, compared to 40. 0% for Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CANF leads at -7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ICG or CANF?
Intchains Group Limited (ICG) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
3% net margin versus -1169. 1% for Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICG leads at 1. 1% versus -1206. 2% for CANF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANF leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ICG or CANF more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICG: 203.
0% to $4. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ICG or CANF?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ICG or CANF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd.
(CANF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88)). Intchains Group Limited (ICG) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CANF: -99. 1%, ICG: -83. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ICG and CANF?
These companies operate in different sectors (ICG (Technology) and CANF (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ICG is a small-cap high-growth stock; CANF is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.