Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IEP vs CVR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
IEP vs CVR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $5.06B | $11M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.88B | $26M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-288M | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 12.0% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | -14.7% |
| Forward P/E | 18.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $6.62B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.42B | $2M |
IEP vs CVR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Icahn Enterprises L… (IEP) | 100 | 15.9 | -84.1% |
| Chicago Rivet & Mac… (CVR) | 100 | 57.5 | -42.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IEP vs CVR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IEP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 6.3%
- Rev growth -7.5%, EPS growth 44.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -13.3%
- 25.6% 10Y total return vs CVR's -26.3%
In this particular matchup, CVR is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -7.5% revenue growth vs CVR's -14.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.9% margin vs CVR's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs CVR's 0.97 | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, vs CVR's 2.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.0% vs CVR's -4.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.9% ROA vs CVR's -14.7%, ROIC -0.0% vs -18.1% |
IEP vs CVR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IEP vs CVR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — IEP and CVR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IEP is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.9B annually — 379.9x CVR's $26M. IEP is the more profitable business, keeping -2.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVR's -13.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.9B | $26M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $954M | -$3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$288M | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$654M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | -14.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | -6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | +5.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.8% | +104.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CVR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $11M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $9M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.27x | -1.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.05x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.76x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 0.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 0.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IEP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IEP delivers a -8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-8 in annual profit, vs $-18 for CVR.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.2% | -17.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | -14.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.0% | -18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | -21.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.93x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.2B | -$2M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.4B | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.6B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.32x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IEP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IEP five years ago would be worth $5,895 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,458 for CVR. Over the past 12 months, IEP leads with a +14.0% total return vs CVR's -4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IEP at -21.2% vs CVR's -22.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.8% | -19.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.0% | -4.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | -53.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.0% | -45.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.6% | -26.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.2% | -22.5% |
Risk & Volatility
IEP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IEP is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVR's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IEP currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs CVR's 75.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.99 | $15.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.08 | $8.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.5% | +75.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.5 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 952K | 3K |
Analyst Outlook
IEP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, IEP offers the higher dividend yield at 6.31% vs CVR's 2.93%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.3% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.50 | $0.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IEP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CVR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IEP vs CVR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IEP or CVR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Icahn Enterprises L.
P. (IEP) is the stronger pick with -7. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR). Analysts rate Icahn Enterprises L. P. (IEP) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IEP or CVR?
Over the past 5 years, Icahn Enterprises L.
P. (IEP) delivered a total return of -41. 0%, compared to -45. 4% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IEP returned +25. 6% versus CVR's -26. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IEP or CVR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Icahn Enterprises L.
P. (IEP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. 's 0. 97β — meaning CVR is approximately 62% more volatile than IEP relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — IEP or CVR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Icahn Enterprises L.
P. (IEP) is pulling ahead at -7. 5% versus -14. 3% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Icahn Enterprises L. P. grew EPS 44. 7% year-over-year, compared to -27. 4% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVR leads at -7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IEP or CVR?
Icahn Enterprises L.
P. (IEP) is the more profitable company, earning -3. 1% net margin versus -20. 8% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. — meaning it keeps -3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IEP leads at -0. 0% versus -19. 1% for CVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IEP leads at 8. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IEP or CVR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Icahn Enterprises L. P. (IEP) offers the highest yield at 6. 3%, versus 2. 9% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR).
07Is IEP or CVR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Icahn Enterprises L.
P. (IEP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 6. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IEP: +25. 6%, CVR: -26. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IEP and CVR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IEP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CVR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.