Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IFF vs FMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Inputs
IFF vs FMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $21.18B | $1.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.79B | $3.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $839M | $-2.50B |
| Gross Margin | 35.1% | 35.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | -59.5% |
| Forward P/E | 18.9x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $6.65B | $4.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $590M | $585M |
IFF vs FMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| International Flavo… (IFF) | 100 | 62.3 | -37.7% |
| FMC Corporation (FMC) | 100 | 15.0 | -85.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IFF vs FMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IFF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -5.2%, EPS growth -253.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.3%
- -7.7% 10Y total return vs FMC's -26.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 46.9%, current ratio 1.42x
FMC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.63, yield 15.7%
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 18.9x)
- 15.7% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs IFF's 1.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.2% revenue growth vs FMC's -18.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 18.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs FMC's -72.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs FMC's 1.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 15.7% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs IFF's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.7% vs FMC's -54.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs FMC's -23.0%, ROIC 3.5% vs -21.2% |
IFF vs FMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IFF vs FMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IFF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IFF is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 3.1x FMC's $3.4B. IFF is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FMC's -72.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.8B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.7B | -$1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $839M | -$2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $400M | -$91M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.1% | +35.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | -59.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | -72.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | -4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +116.6% | -17.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FMC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21.2B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27.2B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -56.80x | -0.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.90x | 8.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.89x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.95x | 0.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 0.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 82.75x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IFF leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IFF delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-82 for FMC. IFF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FMC's 2.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IFF scores 5/9 vs FMC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | -82.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | -23.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | -21.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | -25.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 2.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.1B | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $590M | $585M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.7B | $4.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.26x | -0.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IFF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IFF five years ago would be worth $6,506 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,128 for FMC. Over the past 12 months, IFF leads with a +6.7% total return vs FMC's -54.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IFF at -2.9% vs FMC's -43.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.5% | +3.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.7% | -54.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.4% | -81.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.9% | -78.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.7% | -26.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.9% | -43.0% |
Risk & Volatility
IFF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IFF is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FMC's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IFF currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs FMC's 33.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $84.19 | $44.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.14 | $12.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +33.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 43.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
FMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IFF as "Buy" and FMC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.8% upside for IFF (target: $88) vs 5.3% for FMC (target: $16). For income investors, FMC offers the higher dividend yield at 15.73% vs IFF's 1.93%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.75 | $15.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +15.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.60 | $2.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.1% |
IFF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FMC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
IFF vs FMC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IFF or FMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
(IFF) is the stronger pick with -5. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 3% for FMC Corporation (FMC). Analysts rate International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IFF or FMC?
Over the past 5 years, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
(IFF) delivered a total return of -34. 9%, compared to -78. 7% for FMC Corporation (FMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IFF returned -7. 7% versus FMC's -26. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IFF or FMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
(IFF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus FMC Corporation's 1. 63β — meaning FMC is approximately 140% more volatile than IFF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 2% for FMC Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IFF or FMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
(IFF) is pulling ahead at -5. 2% versus -18. 3% for FMC Corporation (FMC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. grew EPS -253. 7% year-over-year, compared to -757. 4% for FMC Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, IFF leads at -4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IFF or FMC?
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
(IFF) is the more profitable company, earning -3. 4% net margin versus -64. 6% for FMC Corporation — meaning it keeps -3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IFF leads at 9. 2% versus -54. 4% for FMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FMC leads at 37. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IFF or FMC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, FMC Corporation (FMC) trades at 8.
4x forward P/E versus 18. 9x for International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. — 10. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IFF: 5. 8% to $87. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — IFF or FMC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
FMC Corporation (FMC) offers the highest yield at 15. 7%, versus 1. 9% for International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF).
08Is IFF or FMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.
(IFF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 1. 9% yield). FMC Corporation (FMC) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IFF: -7. 7%, FMC: -26. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IFF and FMC?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IFF is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FMC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.