Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IMMR vs ACTG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IMMR
Immersion Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$213M
5Y Perf.-3.3%
ACTG
Acacia Research Corporation

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$489M
5Y Perf.+95.8%

IMMR vs ACTG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IMMR logoIMMR
ACTG logoACTG
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSpecialty Business Services
Market Cap$213M$489M
Revenue (TTM)$1.47B$285M
Net Income (TTM)$66M$22M
Gross Margin27.8%82.5%
Operating Margin9.1%2.2%
Forward P/E15.6x23.0x
Total Debt$322M$100M
Cash & Equiv.$78M$307M

IMMR vs ACTGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IMMR
ACTG
StockMay 20May 26Return
Immersion Corporati… (IMMR)10096.7-3.3%
Acacia Research Cor… (ACTG)100195.8+95.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IMMR vs ACTG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IMMR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Acacia Research Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
The Income Pick

IMMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.52, yield 5.9%
  • Rev growth 35.4%, EPS growth 295.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 227.7%
  • 9.7% 10Y total return vs ACTG's 9.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ACTG
Acacia Research Corporation
The Defensive Pick

ACTG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.2%, current ratio 9.18x
  • Beta 0.76, current ratio 9.18x
  • 7.6% margin vs IMMR's 4.5%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIMMR logoIMMR35.4% revenue growth vs ACTG's 133.2%
ValueIMMR logoIMMRLower P/E (15.6x vs 23.0x)
Quality / MarginsACTG logoACTG7.6% margin vs IMMR's 4.5%
Stability / SafetyACTG logoACTGBeta 0.76 vs IMMR's 1.52, lower leverage
DividendsIMMR logoIMMR5.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ACTG logoACTG+64.6% vs IMMR's -4.6%
Efficiency (ROA)IMMR logoIMMR5.3% ROA vs ACTG's 2.8%, ROIC 21.2% vs 1.2%

IMMR vs ACTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IMMRImmersion Corporation
FY 2023
Fixed Fee License and Per-Unit Royalties
49.9%$34M
Per-Unit Royalties
42.1%$28M
Fixed Fee License
7.8%$5M
Development, Services and Other
0.2%$138,000
ACTGAcacia Research Corporation
FY 2025
License fees
50.4%$78M
Oil
18.4%$29M
Printers and parts
18.2%$28M
Natural Gas
11.7%$18M
Service, Other
1.3%$2M

IMMR vs ACTG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIMMRLAGGINGACTG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ACTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

IMMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 5.2x ACTG's $285M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.6% (ACTG) to 4.5% (IMMR).

MetricIMMR logoIMMRImmersion Corpora…ACTG logoACTGAcacia Research C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.5B$285M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$166M$50M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$66M$22M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$69M$59M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.8%+82.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.1%+2.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.5%+7.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.7%+20.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.4%+2.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-137.3%+125.0%
ACTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IMMR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 1.6x trailing earnings, IMMR trades at a 93% valuation discount to ACTG's 23.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMMR's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACTG's 5.7x.

MetricIMMR logoIMMRImmersion Corpora…ACTG logoACTGAcacia Research C…
Market CapShares × price$213M$489M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$457M$283M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS1.59x23.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.61x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.96x5.69x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.17x1.71x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.38x0.84x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.35x
IMMR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IMMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

IMMR delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $4 for ACTG. ACTG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IMMR's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACTG scores 9/9 vs IMMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricIMMR logoIMMRImmersion Corpora…ACTG logoACTGAcacia Research C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.0%+3.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.3%+2.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+21.2%+1.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+25.8%+0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–929
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.57x0.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$244M-$206M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$78M$307M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$322M$100M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense12.24x0.71x
IMMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMMR five years ago would be worth $9,055 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,586 for ACTG. Over the past 12 months, ACTG leads with a +64.6% total return vs IMMR's -4.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACTG at 8.9% vs IMMR's 1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIMMR logoIMMRImmersion Corpora…ACTG logoACTGAcacia Research C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.4%+35.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-4.6%+64.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4.1%+29.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-9.5%-14.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+9.7%+9.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.4%+8.9%
ACTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ACTG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACTG is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMMR's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACTG currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs IMMR's 80.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIMMR logoIMMRImmersion Corpora…ACTG logoACTGAcacia Research C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.52x0.76x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.15$5.27
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.25$2.99
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+80.2%+96.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.961.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded517K333K
ACTG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IMMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates IMMR as "Buy" and ACTG as "Buy". IMMR is the only dividend payer here at 5.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricIMMR logoIMMRImmersion Corpora…ACTG logoACTGAcacia Research C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts157
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises30
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.39
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%0.0%
IMMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ACTG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). IMMR leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallImmersion Corporation (IMMR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IMMR vs ACTG: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IMMR or ACTG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the stronger pick with 35.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 133. 2% for Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG). Immersion Corporation (IMMR) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immersion Corporation (IMMR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IMMR or ACTG?

On trailing P/E, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the cheapest at 1.

6x versus Acacia Research Corporation at 23. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IMMR or ACTG?

Over the past 5 years, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) delivered a total return of -9.

5%, compared to -14. 1% for Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMMR returned +9. 7% versus ACTG's +9. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IMMR or ACTG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

76β versus Immersion Corporation's 1. 52β — meaning IMMR is approximately 101% more volatile than ACTG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 57% for Immersion Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IMMR or ACTG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is pulling ahead at 35.

4% versus 133. 2% for Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Immersion Corporation grew EPS 295. 2% year-over-year, compared to 161. 1% for Acacia Research Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMMR leads at 227. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IMMR or ACTG?

Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

6% net margin versus 7. 3% for Immersion Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMMR leads at 10. 7% versus 2. 2% for ACTG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACTG leads at 82. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — IMMR or ACTG?

In this comparison, IMMR (5.

9% yield) pays a dividend. ACTG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is IMMR or ACTG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

76)). Immersion Corporation (IMMR) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACTG: +9. 5%, IMMR: +9. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between IMMR and ACTG?

These companies operate in different sectors (IMMR (Technology) and ACTG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

IMMR pays a dividend while ACTG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

IMMR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 270%
  • Gross Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACTG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IMMR and ACTG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IMMR: 541.7% · ACTG: 2.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(IMMR: 4.5% · ACTG: 7.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(IMMR: 1.6x · ACTG: 23.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.