Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IMMR vs ACTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
IMMR vs ACTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $213M | $489M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.47B | $285M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $66M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 27.8% | 82.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | 2.2% |
| Forward P/E | 15.6x | 23.0x |
| Total Debt | $322M | $100M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $307M |
IMMR vs ACTG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immersion Corporati… (IMMR) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
| Acacia Research Cor… (ACTG) | 100 | 195.8 | +95.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMMR vs ACTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.52, yield 5.9%
- Rev growth 35.4%, EPS growth 295.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 227.7%
- 9.7% 10Y total return vs ACTG's 9.5%
ACTG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.2%, current ratio 9.18x
- Beta 0.76, current ratio 9.18x
- 7.6% margin vs IMMR's 4.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.4% revenue growth vs ACTG's 133.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 23.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.6% margin vs IMMR's 4.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs IMMR's 1.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.6% vs IMMR's -4.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs ACTG's 2.8%, ROIC 21.2% vs 1.2% |
IMMR vs ACTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IMMR vs ACTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 5.2x ACTG's $285M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.6% (ACTG) to 4.5% (IMMR).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $285M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $166M | $50M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $66M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$69M | $59M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +82.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +2.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | +20.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -137.3% | +125.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IMMR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.6x trailing earnings, IMMR trades at a 93% valuation discount to ACTG's 23.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMMR's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACTG's 5.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $213M | $489M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $457M | $283M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.59x | 23.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.61x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.96x | 5.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 1.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.38x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMMR delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $4 for ACTG. ACTG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IMMR's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACTG scores 9/9 vs IMMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.2% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.8% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $244M | -$206M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $307M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $322M | $100M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.24x | 0.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMMR five years ago would be worth $9,055 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,586 for ACTG. Over the past 12 months, ACTG leads with a +64.6% total return vs IMMR's -4.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACTG at 8.9% vs IMMR's 1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.4% | +35.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.6% | +64.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.1% | +29.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.5% | -14.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.7% | +9.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.4% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ACTG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACTG is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMMR's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACTG currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs IMMR's 80.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.15 | $5.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.25 | $2.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.2% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.9 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 517K | 333K |
Analyst Outlook
IMMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IMMR as "Buy" and ACTG as "Buy". IMMR is the only dividend payer here at 5.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.39 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
ACTG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). IMMR leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
IMMR vs ACTG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMMR or ACTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the stronger pick with 35.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 133. 2% for Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG). Immersion Corporation (IMMR) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immersion Corporation (IMMR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMMR or ACTG?
On trailing P/E, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the cheapest at 1.
6x versus Acacia Research Corporation at 23. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMMR or ACTG?
Over the past 5 years, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) delivered a total return of -9.
5%, compared to -14. 1% for Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMMR returned +9. 7% versus ACTG's +9. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMMR or ACTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
76β versus Immersion Corporation's 1. 52β — meaning IMMR is approximately 101% more volatile than ACTG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 57% for Immersion Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMMR or ACTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is pulling ahead at 35.
4% versus 133. 2% for Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Immersion Corporation grew EPS 295. 2% year-over-year, compared to 161. 1% for Acacia Research Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMMR leads at 227. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMMR or ACTG?
Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
6% net margin versus 7. 3% for Immersion Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMMR leads at 10. 7% versus 2. 2% for ACTG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACTG leads at 82. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — IMMR or ACTG?
In this comparison, IMMR (5.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ACTG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is IMMR or ACTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
76)). Immersion Corporation (IMMR) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACTG: +9. 5%, IMMR: +9. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IMMR and ACTG?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMMR (Technology) and ACTG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
IMMR pays a dividend while ACTG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.