IMMR vs FORM

For growth investors, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the stronger pick with 35.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 8% for FormFactor, Inc. (FORM). Immersion Corporation (IMMR) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immersion Corporation (IMMR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the cheapest at 1.

6x versus FormFactor, Inc. at 216. 1x. On forward P/E, Immersion Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 6x.

Over the past 5 years, FormFactor, Inc.

(FORM) delivered a total return of +289. 8%, compared to -9. 5% for Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FORM returned +20. 8% versus IMMR's +9. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

52β versus FormFactor, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning FORM is approximately 33% more volatile than IMMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 57% for Immersion Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is pulling ahead at 35.

4% versus 2. 8% for FormFactor, Inc. (FORM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Immersion Corporation grew EPS 295. 2% year-over-year, compared to -22. 5% for FormFactor, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMMR leads at 227. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

3% net margin versus 6. 9% for FormFactor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMMR leads at 10. 7% versus 8. 2% for FORM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FORM leads at 39. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) trades at 15.

6x forward P/E versus 68. 5x for FormFactor, Inc. — 52. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMMR: 52. 9% to $10. 00.

In this comparison, IMMR (5.

9% yield) pays a dividend. FORM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (5.

9% yield). FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMMR: +9. 7%, FORM: +20. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: IMMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; FORM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. IMMR pays a dividend while FORM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.