Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IMPP vs ESEA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
IMPP vs ESEA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $167M | $506M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $228M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 63.5% |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | 61.6% |
| Forward P/E | 2.4x | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $79K | $217M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68M | $177M |
IMPP vs ESEA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imperial Petroleum … (IMPP) | 100 | 15.3 | -84.7% |
| Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) | 100 | 356.8 | +256.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMPP vs ESEA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMPP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 7.92x
- Beta 0.65, yield 1.1%, current ratio 7.92x
- Lower P/E (2.4x vs 4.3x)
ESEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 3.8%
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 21.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
- 389.1% 10Y total return vs IMPP's -95.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs IMPP's -19.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.4x vs 4.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 60.1% margin vs IMPP's 28.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs ESEA's 1.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs IMPP's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +115.9% vs IMPP's +86.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.6% ROA vs IMPP's 8.2%, ROIC 19.5% vs 10.6% |
IMPP vs ESEA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMPP vs ESEA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ESEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ESEA is the larger business by revenue, generating $228M annually — 1.7x IMPP's $136M. ESEA is the more profitable business, keeping 60.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IMPP's 28.6%. On growth, IMPP holds the edge at +25.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $228M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | $169M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $64M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +63.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +61.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +60.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +47.9% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.4% | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +65.9% |
Valuation Metrics
IMPP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.5x trailing earnings, IMPP trades at a 4% valuation discount to ESEA's 3.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMPP's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ESEA's 3.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $167M | $506M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $99M | $546M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.51x | 3.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.40x | 4.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.63x | 3.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.26x | 7.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ESEA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ESEA delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $8 for IMPP. IMPP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ESEA's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESEA scores 7/9 vs IMPP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +29.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.2% | +19.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +19.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +21.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$68M | $40M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68M | $177M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $78,761 | $217M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.99x | 9.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ESEA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ESEA five years ago would be worth $54,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $436 for IMPP. Over the past 12 months, ESEA leads with a +115.9% total return vs IMPP's +86.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ESEA at 73.8% vs IMPP's 16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.5% | +34.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.7% | +115.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.4% | +425.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.6% | +444.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.6% | +389.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.3% | +73.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMPP and ESEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMPP is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ESEA's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ESEA currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs IMPP's 74.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.57 | $74.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.45 | $33.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.7% | +96.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.0 | 62.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 747K | 86K |
Analyst Outlook
ESEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IMPP as "Hold" and ESEA as "Buy". For income investors, ESEA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.78% vs IMPP's 1.07%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $2.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +0.4% |
ESEA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IMPP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IMPP vs ESEA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMPP or ESEA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) is the stronger pick with 7. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 7% for Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP). Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) offers the better valuation at 3. 5x trailing P/E (2. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMPP or ESEA?
On trailing P/E, Imperial Petroleum Inc.
(IMPP) is the cheapest at 3. 5x versus Euroseas Ltd. at 3. 7x. On forward P/E, Imperial Petroleum Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMPP or ESEA?
Over the past 5 years, Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) delivered a total return of +444. 2%, compared to -95. 6% for Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ESEA returned +389. 1% versus IMPP's -95. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMPP or ESEA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Imperial Petroleum Inc.
(IMPP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Euroseas Ltd. 's 1. 28β — meaning ESEA is approximately 96% more volatile than IMPP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 47% for Euroseas Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMPP or ESEA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) is pulling ahead at 7. 0% versus -19. 7% for Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Euroseas Ltd. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to -52. 2% for Imperial Petroleum Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMPP leads at 104. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMPP or ESEA?
Euroseas Ltd.
(ESEA) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 1% net margin versus 34. 0% for Imperial Petroleum Inc. — meaning it keeps 60. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ESEA leads at 57. 0% versus 29. 9% for IMPP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ESEA leads at 63. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMPP or ESEA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Imperial Petroleum Inc.
(IMPP) trades at 2. 4x forward P/E versus 4. 3x for Euroseas Ltd. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMPP or ESEA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 1% for Imperial Petroleum Inc. (IMPP).
09Is IMPP or ESEA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Imperial Petroleum Inc.
(IMPP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMPP: -95. 6%, ESEA: +389. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMPP and ESEA?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMPP (Energy) and ESEA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.