Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
IPDN vs RCMT vs KFRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
Staffing & Employment Services
IPDN vs RCMT vs KFRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Conglomerates | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $964K | $213M | $769M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $319M | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2.36B | $16M | $35M |
| Gross Margin | 44.1% | 27.2% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | -136.0% | 7.9% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.0x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $279K | $26M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $3M | $2M |
IPDN vs RCMT vs KFRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional Divers… (IPDN) | 100 | 4.2 | -95.8% |
| RCM Technologies, I… (RCMT) | 100 | 2239.6 | +2139.6% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 139.2 | +39.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IPDN vs RCMT vs KFRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IPDN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
RCMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.7%, EPS growth 28.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 494.1% 10Y total return vs KFRC's 187.9%
- 14.7% revenue growth vs IPDN's -12.6%
KFRC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.7%, current ratio 1.78x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.7% revenue growth vs IPDN's -12.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 17.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.1% margin vs IPDN's -135.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs IPDN's 1.35 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.3% vs IPDN's -58.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs IPDN's -194.3%, ROIC 26.9% vs -68.4% |
IPDN vs RCMT vs KFRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IPDN vs RCMT vs KFRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RCMT leads in 3 of 6 categories
KFRC leads 1 • IPDN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KFRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 209.2x IPDN's $6M. RCMT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IPDN's -135.9%. On growth, IPDN holds the edge at +1021.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $319M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2.3B | $27M | $56M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.4B | $16M | $35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $17M | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.1% | +27.2% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -136.0% | +7.9% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -135.9% | +5.1% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +5.4% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1021.2% | +12.4% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26026.4% | +116.2% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IPDN and RCMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, RCMT trades at a 35% valuation discount to KFRC's 21.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RCMT's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 15.0x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $964,271 | $213M | $769M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$487,572 | $236M | $836M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.38x | 13.96x | 21.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.96x | 17.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.32x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.36x | 15.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 0.67x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.20x | 4.97x | 6.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.25x | 16.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT delivers a 40.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-284 for IPDN. IPDN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCMT's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCMT scores 8/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -284.3% | +40.9% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -194.3% | +12.5% | +9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -68.4% | +26.9% | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -65.9% | +31.6% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.56x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $23M | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $3M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $279,312 | $26M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -66476.01x | 9.05x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCMT five years ago would be worth $88,265 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $242 for IPDN. Over the past 12 months, RCMT leads with a +74.3% total return vs IPDN's -58.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCMT at 35.0% vs IPDN's -74.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.1% | +51.1% | +35.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.2% | +74.3% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +145.8% | -15.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | +782.6% | -18.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | +494.1% | +187.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.7% | +35.0% | -5.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RCMT and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IPDN's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCMT currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs IPDN's 6.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 1.30x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.39 | $32.50 | $47.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.68 | $17.05 | $24.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.2% | +92.3% | +88.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.0 | 72.6 | 71.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 82K | 66K | 307K |
Analyst Outlook
KFRC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RCMT as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold". KFRC is the only dividend payer here at 3.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $71.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% | +6.6% |
RCMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KFRC leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
IPDN vs RCMT vs KFRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IPDN or RCMT or KFRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the stronger pick with 14. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 6% for Professional Diversity Network, Inc. (IPDN). RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IPDN or RCMT or KFRC?
On trailing P/E, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus Kforce Inc. at 21. 5x. On forward P/E, RCM Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IPDN or RCMT or KFRC?
Over the past 5 years, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) delivered a total return of +782. 6%, compared to -97. 6% for Professional Diversity Network, Inc. (IPDN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCMT returned +494. 1% versus IPDN's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IPDN or RCMT or KFRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Professional Diversity Network, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning IPDN is approximately 156% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Professional Diversity Network, Inc. (IPDN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 56% for RCM Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IPDN or RCMT or KFRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is pulling ahead at 14. 7% versus -12. 6% for Professional Diversity Network, Inc. (IPDN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RCM Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 28. 0% year-over-year, compared to -390. 2% for Professional Diversity Network, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCMT leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IPDN or RCMT or KFRC?
RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 1% net margin versus -37. 3% for Professional Diversity Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCMT leads at 7. 9% versus -38. 6% for IPDN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IPDN leads at 60. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IPDN or RCMT or KFRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for Kforce Inc. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — IPDN or RCMT or KFRC?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
7% yield) pays a dividend. IPDN, RCMT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IPDN or RCMT or KFRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 7% yield, +187. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +187. 9%, IPDN: -99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IPDN and RCMT and KFRC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IPDN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCMT is a small-cap deep-value stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. KFRC pays a dividend while IPDN, RCMT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare RCMT vs HURN
HURN is one of the most direct listed alternatives to RCMT.
Compare KFRC vs KELYA
KELYA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to KFRC.
Expand With CCRN + HURN
CCRN and HURN are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.