Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IPX vs ATLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Other Precious Metals
IPX vs ATLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Other Precious Metals |
| Market Cap | $1.27B | $122M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $180K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $-33M |
| Gross Margin | — | -64.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -192.9% |
| Total Debt | $4M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $55M | $16M |
IPX vs ATLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IperionX Limited (IPX) | 100 | 798.9 | +698.9% |
| Atlas Lithium Corpo… (ATLX) | 100 | 80.0 | -20.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IPX vs ATLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IPX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 2.14
- 436.2% 10Y total return vs ATLX's -36.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.14, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 6.99x
ATLX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -66.5%, EPS growth 29.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 302.5%
- -66.5% revenue growth vs IPX's -3.4K%
- -45.2% ROA vs IPX's -69.2%, ROIC -13.0% vs -96.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -66.5% revenue growth vs IPX's -3.4K% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.8% margin vs ATLX's -180.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.14 vs ATLX's 2.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.7% vs ATLX's +37.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -45.2% ROA vs IPX's -69.2%, ROIC -13.0% vs -96.2% |
IPX vs ATLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IPX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATLX and IPX operate at a comparable scale, with $180,454 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $180,454 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$72M | -$35M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | -$33M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$55M | -$32M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -64.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -192.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -180.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -175.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +174.3% | +99.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IPX and ATLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $122M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $117M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -31.46x | -1.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 182.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.03x | 3.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IPX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IPX delivers a -78.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-79 in annual profit, vs $-92 for ATLX. IPX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATLX's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATLX scores 5/9 vs IPX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.5% | -91.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -69.2% | -45.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -96.2% | -13.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -52.7% | -97.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$51M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $55M | $16M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -207.07x | -57.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IPX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IPX five years ago would be worth $53,622 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,400 for ATLX. Over the past 12 months, IPX leads with a +67.7% total return vs ATLX's +37.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IPX at 74.5% vs ATLX's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.4% | +27.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.7% | +37.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +430.9% | -80.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +436.2% | -36.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +436.2% | -36.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +74.5% | -41.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IPX and ATLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IPX is the less volatile stock with a 2.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATLX's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATLX currently trades 67.9% from its 52-week high vs IPX's 61.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.14x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.45 | $8.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.43 | $3.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.4% | +67.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.1 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 280K | 528K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IPX as "Buy" and ATLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 239.3% upside for ATLX (target: $19) vs 23.2% for IPX (target: $47).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.50 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IPX leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
IPX vs ATLX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IPX or ATLX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate IperionX Limited (IPX) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IPX or ATLX?
Over the past 5 years, IperionX Limited (IPX) delivered a total return of +436.
2%, compared to -36. 0% for Atlas Lithium Corporation (ATLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IPX returned +436. 2% versus ATLX's -36. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IPX or ATLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IperionX Limited (IPX) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
14β versus Atlas Lithium Corporation's 2. 15β — meaning ATLX is approximately 1% more volatile than IPX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IperionX Limited (IPX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 47% for Atlas Lithium Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IPX or ATLX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Atlas Lithium Corporation grew EPS 29.
2% year-over-year, compared to -20. 0% for IperionX Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IPX or ATLX?
IperionX Limited (IPX) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -63. 3% for Atlas Lithium Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IPX leads at 0. 0% versus -65. 7% for ATLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATLX leads at 39. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IPX or ATLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is IPX or ATLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IperionX Limited (IPX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+436.
2% 10Y return). Atlas Lithium Corporation (ATLX) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IPX: +436. 2%, ATLX: -36. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IPX and ATLX?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.