Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IXHL vs MNMD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
IXHL vs MNMD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $165M | $2.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $104K | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-62M | $-238M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -451.1% | — |
| Total Debt | $258K | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $258M |
IXHL vs MNMD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incannex Healthcare… (IXHL) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Mind Medicine (Mind… (MNMD) | 100 | 113.6 | +13.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IXHL vs MNMD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IXHL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.65
- Rev growth 378.7%, EPS growth -10.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.65, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 2.86x
MNMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs IXHL's -98.9%
- 1.2% margin vs IXHL's -600.6%
- +214.0% vs IXHL's +32.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 378.7% revenue growth vs MNMD's -96.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.2% margin vs IXHL's -600.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.65 vs MNMD's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +214.0% vs IXHL's +32.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -70.7% ROA vs IXHL's -305.4%, ROIC -389.5% vs -8.2% |
IXHL vs MNMD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IXHL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IXHL and MNMD operate at a comparable scale, with $103,965 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $103,965 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$47M | -$191M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$62M | -$238M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | -$174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -451.1% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -600.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -141.6% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.4% | -163.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MNMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $165M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $151M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.53x | -10.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1923.03x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.35x | 5.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNMD leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNMD delivers a -102.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-102 in annual profit, vs $-5 for IXHL. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IXHL scores 4/9 vs MNMD's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.7% | -102.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | -70.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.2% | -3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -191.2% | -52.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | -$258M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $258M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $258,000 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -160.97x | -21.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNMD five years ago would be worth $4,205 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $108 for IXHL. Over the past 12 months, MNMD leads with a +214.0% total return vs IXHL's +32.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNMD at 82.7% vs IXHL's -56.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -59.0% | +51.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.2% | +214.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.7% | +510.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -57.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | +512.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.4% | +82.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IXHL and MNMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IXHL is the less volatile stock with a 1.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNMD's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNMD currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs IXHL's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 1.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.80 | $21.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.34 | $6.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.6% | +98.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.0 | 64.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 590K | 792K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MNMD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). IXHL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
IXHL vs MNMD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IXHL or MNMD a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IXHL or MNMD?
Over the past 5 years, Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) delivered a total return of -57. 9%, compared to -98. 9% for Incannex Healthcare Limited (IXHL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNMD returned +512. 1% versus IXHL's -98. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IXHL or MNMD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Incannex Healthcare Limited (IXHL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
65β versus Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning MNMD is approximately 2% more volatile than IXHL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — IXHL or MNMD?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Incannex Healthcare Limited grew EPS -1093.
0% year-over-year, compared to -1273. 3% for Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IXHL or MNMD?
Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -545. 2% for Incannex Healthcare Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNMD leads at 0. 0% versus -276. 6% for IXHL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IXHL leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IXHL or MNMD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is IXHL or MNMD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+512. 1% 10Y return). Incannex Healthcare Limited (IXHL) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNMD: +512. 1%, IXHL: -98. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IXHL and MNMD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IXHL is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.