Construction Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
JHX vs IBP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
JHX vs IBP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $12.17B | $5.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.40B | $2.95B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $119M | $255M |
| Gross Margin | 35.9% | 33.9% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | 19.1x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.21B | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $563M | $322M |
JHX vs IBP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| James Hardie Indust… (JHX) | 100 | 121.9 | +21.9% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 342.2 | +242.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JHX vs IBP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, JHX is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
IBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 6.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.6%
- 6.6% 10Y total return vs JHX's 65.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.0% revenue growth vs JHX's -1.5% | |
| Value | PEG 0.82 vs 1.51 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.6% margin vs JHX's 2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs JHX's 1.59 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs JHX's -12.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs JHX's 0.9%, ROIC 20.7% vs 17.9% |
JHX vs IBP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JHX vs IBP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — JHX and IBP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JHX and IBP operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $2.9B in trailing revenue. IBP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JHX's 2.7%. On growth, JHX holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.4B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $927M | $656M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $119M | $255M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $206M | $63M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +33.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.1% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.6% | -21.3% |
Valuation Metrics
IBP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.4x trailing earnings, JHX trades at a 6% valuation discount to IBP's 22.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 0.93x vs JHX's 1.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.2B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.8B | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.41x | 22.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.13x | 19.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.69x | 0.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.69x | 13.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.14x | 1.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.19x | 8.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.97x | 19.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP delivers a 37.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $2 for JHX. JHX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs JHX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.9% | +37.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.9% | +20.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.4% | +22.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 1.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $642M | $731M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $563M | $322M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.23x | 9.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBP five years ago would be worth $18,172 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,299 for JHX. Over the past 12 months, IBP leads with a +37.3% total return vs JHX's -12.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 26.2% vs JHX's -3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.8% | -16.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.7% | +37.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.2% | +101.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.0% | +81.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.9% | +660.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.5% | +26.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JHX and IBP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBP is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JHX's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JHX currently trades 70.3% from its 52-week high vs IBP's 63.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.83 | $349.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.46 | $150.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.3% | +63.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 28.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.4M | 345K |
Analyst Outlook
IBP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates JHX as "Buy" and IBP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.8% upside for JHX (target: $25) vs 14.2% for IBP (target: $251). IBP is the only dividend payer here at 1.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.50 | $251.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +2.9% |
IBP leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
JHX vs IBP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JHX or IBP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the stronger pick with 1. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for James Hardie Industries plc (JHX). James Hardie Industries plc (JHX) offers the better valuation at 21. 4x trailing P/E (19. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate James Hardie Industries plc (JHX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JHX or IBP?
On trailing P/E, James Hardie Industries plc (JHX) is the cheapest at 21.
4x versus Installed Building Products, Inc. at 22. 7x. On forward P/E, James Hardie Industries plc is actually cheaper at 19. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 0. 82x versus James Hardie Industries plc's 1. 51x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JHX or IBP?
Over the past 5 years, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) delivered a total return of +81. 7%, compared to -37. 0% for James Hardie Industries plc (JHX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +660. 5% versus JHX's +65. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JHX or IBP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus James Hardie Industries plc's 1. 59β — meaning JHX is approximately 22% more volatile than IBP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, James Hardie Industries plc (JHX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JHX or IBP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is pulling ahead at 1. 0% versus -1. 5% for James Hardie Industries plc (JHX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Installed Building Products, Inc. grew EPS 6. 7% year-over-year, compared to -15. 5% for James Hardie Industries plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, IBP leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JHX or IBP?
James Hardie Industries plc (JHX) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
9% net margin versus 8. 9% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JHX leads at 16. 9% versus 13. 0% for IBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JHX leads at 38. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JHX or IBP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus James Hardie Industries plc's 1. 51x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, James Hardie Industries plc (JHX) trades at 19. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for Installed Building Products, Inc. — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JHX: 16. 8% to $24. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — JHX or IBP?
In this comparison, IBP (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. JHX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JHX or IBP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 5% yield, +660. 5% 10Y return). James Hardie Industries plc (JHX) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +660. 5%, JHX: +65. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JHX and IBP?
These companies operate in different sectors (JHX (Basic Materials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
IBP pays a dividend while JHX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.