Staffing & Employment Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JOB vs KELYA vs TBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
JOB vs KELYA vs TBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $25M | $417M | $212M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $4.13B | $1.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-266M | $-53M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 19.5% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | -1.7% | -1.9% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $159M | $171M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $33M | $25M |
JOB vs KELYA vs TBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEE Group, Inc. (JOB) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 76.1 | -23.9% |
| TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) | 100 | 45.7 | -54.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JOB vs KELYA vs TBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JOB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 4.12x
- Beta 0.64, current ratio 4.12x
KELYA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -24.0% 10Y total return vs TBI's -64.4%
- Better valuation composite
- 2.6% yield; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
TBI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.1%, EPS growth 61.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.5%
- 3.1% revenue growth vs JOB's -17.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.1% revenue growth vs JOB's -17.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.2% margin vs KELYA's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs KELYA's 0.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs KELYA's +3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.8% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC -4.2% vs -4.0% |
JOB vs KELYA vs TBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JOB vs KELYA vs TBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JOB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KELYA is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 46.9x JOB's $88M. JOB is the more profitable business, keeping -1.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -6.4%. On growth, KELYA holds the edge at -10.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $4.1B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $258,000 | -$35M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$266M | -$53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $726,000 | $66M | -$60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +19.5% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | -1.9% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | -6.4% | -4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +1.6% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.5% | -10.7% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -2.1% | -37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
KELYA leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25M | $417M | $212M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $544M | $358M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.72x | -1.66x | -4.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.34x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 174.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.10x | 0.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.50x | 0.43x | 0.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 47.21x | 3.66x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JOB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JOB delivers a -2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. JOB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TBI's 0.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JOB scores 5/9 vs TBI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -24.6% | -18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | -11.3% | -8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.2% | -4.0% | -5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.1% | -4.3% | -5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.16x | 0.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | $126M | $146M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $33M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $159M | $171M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.91x | -8.78x | -46.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KELYA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KELYA five years ago would be worth $5,392 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,364 for TBI. Over the past 12 months, JOB leads with a +20.3% total return vs KELYA's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KELYA at -10.6% vs TBI's -27.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.5% | +41.1% | +58.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.3% | +3.0% | +3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.3% | -28.6% | -61.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.9% | -46.1% | -76.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | -24.0% | -64.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.7% | -10.6% | -27.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JOB and TBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JOB is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KELYA's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TBI currently trades 89.7% from its 52-week high vs KELYA's 80.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.92x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.28 | $14.94 | $7.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.17 | $7.98 | $3.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.1% | +80.6% | +89.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 70.7 | 70.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 422K | 323K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KELYA as "Buy", TBI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.6% upside for KELYA (target: $15) vs -21.2% for TBI (target: $6). KELYA is the only dividend payer here at 2.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 | $5.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.31 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.9% | +0.5% |
JOB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KELYA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
JOB vs KELYA vs TBI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JOB or KELYA or TBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is the stronger pick with 3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 2% for GEE Group, Inc. (JOB). Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — JOB or KELYA or TBI?
Over the past 5 years, Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) delivered a total return of -46. 1%, compared to -76. 4% for TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KELYA returned -24. 0% versus JOB's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — JOB or KELYA or TBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GEE Group, Inc.
(JOB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Kelly Services, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning KELYA is approximately 44% more volatile than JOB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GEE Group, Inc. (JOB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 62% for TrueBlue, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — JOB or KELYA or TBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is pulling ahead at 3. 1% versus -17. 2% for GEE Group, Inc. (JOB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KELYA leads at -5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — JOB or KELYA or TBI?
TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is the more profitable company, earning -3. 0% net margin versus -36. 0% for GEE Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps -3. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KELYA leads at -1. 6% versus -2. 9% for JOB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JOB leads at 33. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is JOB or KELYA or TBI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KELYA: 24.
6% to $15. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — JOB or KELYA or TBI?
In this comparison, KELYA (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. JOB, TBI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is JOB or KELYA or TBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 2. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KELYA: -24. 0%, TBI: -64. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between JOB and KELYA and TBI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
KELYA pays a dividend while JOB, TBI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.