Compare Stocks

3 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KITT vs OCEA vs ESEA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KITT
Nauticus Robotics, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
OCEA
Ocean Biomedical, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$506M
5Y Perf.+250.5%

KITT vs OCEA vs ESEA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KITT logoKITT
OCEA logoOCEA
ESEA logoESEA
IndustryAerospace & DefenseBiotechnologyMarine Shipping
Market Cap$2M$6K$506M
Revenue (TTM)$5M$0.00$228M
Net Income (TTM)$-41M$-31M$137M
Gross Margin-133.9%63.5%
Operating Margin-449.8%61.6%
Forward P/E4.4x
Total Debt$22M$16M$217M
Cash & Equiv.$7M$177M

KITT vs OCEA vs ESEALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KITT
OCEA
ESEA
StockNov 21May 26Return
Nauticus Robotics, … (KITT)1000.0-100.0%
Ocean Biomedical, I… (OCEA)1000.0-100.0%
Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA)100350.5+250.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KITT vs OCEA vs ESEA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ESEA leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Nauticus Robotics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KITT
Nauticus Robotics, Inc.
The Growth Play

KITT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 191.8%, EPS growth 96.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -22.7%
  • 191.8% revenue growth vs ESEA's 7.0%
Best for: growth exposure
OCEA
Ocean Biomedical, Inc.
The Income Pick

OCEA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • beta 0.30
  • Beta 0.30 vs KITT's 3.01
Best for: income & stability
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder

ESEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 389.1% 10Y total return vs KITT's -100.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.28, Low D/E 46.8%, current ratio 4.89x
  • Beta 1.28, yield 3.8%, current ratio 4.89x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKITT logoKITT191.8% revenue growth vs ESEA's 7.0%
Quality / MarginsESEA logoESEA60.1% margin vs KITT's -7.7%
Stability / SafetyOCEA logoOCEABeta 0.30 vs KITT's 3.01
DividendsESEA logoESEA3.8% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ESEA logoESEA+115.9% vs OCEA's -98.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ESEA logoESEA19.6% ROA vs OCEA's -19.4%

KITT vs OCEA vs ESEA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KITTNauticus Robotics, Inc.
FY 2022
Service
100.0%$11M
OCEAOcean Biomedical, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ESEAEuroseas Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

KITT vs OCEA vs ESEA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLESEALAGGINGOCEA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ESEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ESEA and OCEA operate at a comparable scale, with $228M and $0 in trailing revenue. ESEA is the more profitable business, keeping 60.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KITT's -7.7%. On growth, KITT holds the edge at +124.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKITT logoKITTNauticus Robotics…OCEA logoOCEAOcean Biomedical,…ESEA logoESEAEuroseas Ltd.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5M$0$228M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$21M-$29M$169M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$41M-$31M$137M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$24M-$4M$64M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-133.9%+63.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.5%+61.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.7%+60.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.5%+28.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+124.4%+7.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+96.8%-162.5%+65.9%
ESEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KITT leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricKITT logoKITTNauticus Robotics…OCEA logoOCEAOcean Biomedical,…ESEA logoESEAEuroseas Ltd.
Market CapShares × price$2M$5,501$506M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$17M$16M$546M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.03x-0.00x3.67x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.4.37x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.44x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.30x2.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.27x1.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.90x
KITT leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ESEA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

ESEA delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-6 for KITT. ESEA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KITT's 3.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESEA scores 7/9 vs OCEA's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKITT logoKITTNauticus Robotics…OCEA logoOCEAOcean Biomedical,…ESEA logoESEAEuroseas Ltd.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-5.8%-98.8%+29.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-92.9%-19.4%+19.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-115.9%+19.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.7%+21.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9507
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.16x0.47x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$15M$16M$40M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$177M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$22M$16M$217M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.68x-16.53x9.47x
ESEA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ESEA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ESEA five years ago would be worth $54,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for OCEA. Over the past 12 months, ESEA leads with a +115.9% total return vs OCEA's -98.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ESEA at 73.8% vs OCEA's -96.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKITT logoKITTNauticus Robotics…OCEA logoOCEAOcean Biomedical,…ESEA logoESEAEuroseas Ltd.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-68.4%-84.6%+34.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-96.7%-98.7%+115.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-100.0%+425.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-100.0%+444.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-100.0%+389.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-92.6%-96.8%+73.8%
ESEA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — OCEA and ESEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

OCEA is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KITT's 3.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ESEA currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs OCEA's 1.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKITT logoKITTNauticus Robotics…OCEA logoOCEAOcean Biomedical,…ESEA logoESEAEuroseas Ltd.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.94x1.10x1.38x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$87.12$0.02$74.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.90$0.00$33.76
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+2.6%+1.0%+96.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10027.448.562.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded562K32K86K
Evenly matched — OCEA and ESEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

ESEA is the only dividend payer here at 3.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricKITT logoKITTNauticus Robotics…OCEA logoOCEAOcean Biomedical,…ESEA logoESEAEuroseas Ltd.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target
# AnalystsCovering analysts5
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises5
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.73
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ESEA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KITT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallEuroseas Ltd. (ESEA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KITT vs OCEA vs ESEA: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KITT or OCEA or ESEA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Nauticus Robotics, Inc.

(KITT) is the stronger pick with 191. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 0% for Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA). Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (4. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — KITT or OCEA or ESEA?

Over the past 5 years, Euroseas Ltd.

(ESEA) delivered a total return of +444. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Ocean Biomedical, Inc. (OCEA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ESEA returned +394. 5% versus OCEA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — KITT or OCEA or ESEA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ocean Biomedical, Inc.

(OCEA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Nauticus Robotics, Inc. 's 2. 94β — meaning KITT is approximately 168% more volatile than OCEA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 3% for Nauticus Robotics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — KITT or OCEA or ESEA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nauticus Robotics, Inc.

(KITT) is pulling ahead at 191. 8% versus 7. 0% for Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nauticus Robotics, Inc. grew EPS 96. 8% year-over-year, compared to -153. 2% for Ocean Biomedical, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ESEA leads at 7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — KITT or OCEA or ESEA?

Euroseas Ltd.

(ESEA) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 1% net margin versus -774. 0% for Nauticus Robotics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 60. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ESEA leads at 57. 0% versus -449. 8% for KITT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ESEA leads at 63. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — KITT or OCEA or ESEA?

In this comparison, ESEA (3.

8% yield) pays a dividend. KITT, OCEA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is KITT or OCEA or ESEA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Euroseas Ltd.

(ESEA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 8% yield, +394. 5% 10Y return). Nauticus Robotics, Inc. (KITT) carries a higher beta of 2. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ESEA: +394. 5%, KITT: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between KITT and OCEA and ESEA?

These companies operate in different sectors (KITT (Industrials) and OCEA (Healthcare) and ESEA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KITT is a small-cap high-growth stock; OCEA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ESEA is a small-cap deep-value stock. ESEA pays a dividend while KITT, OCEA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KITT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 62%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OCEA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $500M
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ESEA

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 36%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.