LAND
Gladstone Land Corporation
REIT - Industrial
Market Cap$355M
5Y Perf.-32.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LAND vs GOOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
REIT - Diversified
Market Cap$599M
5Y Perf.-30.9%
LAND vs GOOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LAND | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $355M | $599M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $76M | $166M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $21M |
| Gross Margin | 87.4% | -11.7% |
| Operating Margin | 78.6% | 27.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 80.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $856M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $11M |
LAND vs GOOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LAND
GOOD
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gladstone Land Corp… (LAND) | 100 | 67.5 | -32.5% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 69.1 | -30.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LAND vs GOOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GOOD leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Gladstone Land Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LAND
Gladstone Land Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play
LAND is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and momentum.
- 6.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs GOOD's 11.7%
- +10.3% vs GOOD's -3.6%
Best for: dividends and momentum
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play
GOOD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 11.7%
- Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 57.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
- 49.8% 10Y total return vs LAND's 43.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GOOD | 8.0% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7% |
| Value | GOOD | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | GOOD | 12.7% margin vs LAND's -13.8% |
| Stability / Safety | GOOD | Beta 0.55 vs LAND's 0.68 |
| Dividends | LAND | 6.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs GOOD's 11.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | LAND | +10.3% vs GOOD's -3.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GOOD | 1.7% ROA vs LAND's -0.8%, ROIC 4.4% vs 4.9% |
LAND vs GOOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGOODLAGGINGLAND
LANDGladstone Land Corpor…
1leads
GOODGladstone Commercial …
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LANDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
LAND3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GOOD5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GOOD2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LAND and GOOD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOD is the larger business by revenue, generating $166M annually — 2.2x LAND's $76M. GOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAND's -13.8%. On growth, LAND holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LANDGladstone Land Co… | GOODGladstone Commerc… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $76M | $166M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $94M | $106M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5M | $90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.4% | -11.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +78.6% | +27.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.8% | +12.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +54.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.6% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +2.8% |
Evenly matched — LAND and GOOD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
LAND leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LAND's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GOOD's 12.2x.
| Metric | LANDGladstone Land Co… | GOODGladstone Commerc… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $355M | $599M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $328M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -33.76x | 30.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 80.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.48x | 12.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.67x | 3.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.53x | 1.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 50.83x | 8.92x |
LAND leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LAND and GOOD each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LAND. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOD scores 4/9 vs LAND's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | LANDGladstone Land Co… | GOODGladstone Commerc… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.6% | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$27M | $846M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $856M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.99x | 1.46x |
Evenly matched — LAND and GOOD each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOD five years ago would be worth $8,994 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,849 for LAND. Over the past 12 months, LAND leads with a +10.3% total return vs GOOD's -3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOD at 12.1% vs LAND's -10.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LANDGladstone Land Co… | GOODGladstone Commerc… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.3% | +18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.3% | -3.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.3% | +40.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.5% | -10.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.2% | +49.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.1% | +12.1% |
GOOD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOOD is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LAND's 0.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOD currently trades 82.4% from its 52-week high vs LAND's 75.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LANDGladstone Land Co… | GOODGladstone Commerc… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.00 | $15.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.47 | $10.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.3% | +82.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.8 | 65.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 570K | 390K |
GOOD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LAND and GOOD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LAND as "Buy" and GOOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.0% upside for GOOD (target: $13) vs 2.1% for LAND (target: $10). For income investors, GOOD offers the higher dividend yield at 11.66% vs LAND's 6.72%.
| Metric | LANDGladstone Land Co… | GOODGladstone Commerc… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.7% | +11.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.66 | $1.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
Evenly matched — LAND and GOOD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
GOOD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). LAND leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
Best OverallGladstone Commercial Corpor… (GOOD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LAND vs GOOD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LAND or GOOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the stronger pick with 8.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the better valuation at 30. 2x trailing P/E (80. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LAND or GOOD?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) delivered a total return of -10.
1%, compared to -41. 5% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOD returned +49. 8% versus LAND's +43. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LAND or GOOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus Gladstone Land Corporation's 0. 68β — meaning LAND is approximately 23% more volatile than GOOD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LAND or GOOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is pulling ahead at 8.
0% versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gladstone Commercial Corporation grew EPS 57. 7% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Gladstone Land Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOD leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LAND or GOOD?
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus -13. 8% for Gladstone Land Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAND leads at 78. 6% versus 37. 2% for GOOD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LAND leads at 87. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LAND or GOOD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOOD: 5.
0% to $13. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — LAND or GOOD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the highest yield at 11. 7%, versus 6. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND).
08Is LAND or GOOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 11. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOD: +49. 8%, LAND: +43. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LAND and GOOD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(LAND: 38.6% · GOOD: 11.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.