Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LEVI vs RL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
LEVI vs RL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $8.85B | $48.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.28B | $7.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $578M | $919M |
| Gross Margin | 61.7% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 10.8% | 15.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 22.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.31B | $2.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $758M | $1.92B |
LEVI vs RL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) | 100 | 168.1 | +68.1% |
| Ralph Lauren Corpor… (RL) | 100 | 474.7 | +374.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LEVI vs RL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LEVI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.40, yield 2.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, current ratio 1.55x
- Beta 1.40, yield 2.3%, current ratio 1.55x
RL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 19.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- 324.6% 10Y total return vs LEVI's 13.7%
- 6.7% revenue growth vs LEVI's -1.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.7% revenue growth vs LEVI's -1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.1x vs 22.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.7% margin vs LEVI's 9.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.40 vs RL's 1.53, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs RL's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.0% vs LEVI's +36.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs LEVI's 8.4%, ROIC 20.6% vs 13.9% |
LEVI vs RL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LEVI vs RL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RL and LEVI operate at a comparable scale, with $7.8B and $6.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.7% (RL) to 9.2% (LEVI). On growth, RL holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.3B | $7.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $884M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $578M | $919M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $324M | $695M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.7% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +15.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +11.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.0% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.0% | +24.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LEVI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.6x trailing earnings, LEVI trades at a 49% valuation discount to RL's 30.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LEVI's 11.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RL's 42.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.9B | $48.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.4B | $49.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.64x | 30.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.12x | 21.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.77x | 42.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.41x | 6.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.98x | 8.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.30x | 47.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RL delivers a 31.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $25 for LEVI. LEVI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RL's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RL scores 8/9 vs LEVI's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.4% | +31.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.4% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.9% | +20.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.8% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.01x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $746M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $758M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 14.05x | 23.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RL five years ago would be worth $27,197 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,395 for LEVI. Over the past 12 months, RL leads with a +44.0% total return vs LEVI's +36.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RL at 48.8% vs LEVI's 19.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.3% | -0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.1% | +44.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.6% | +229.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.1% | +172.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.7% | +324.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.7% | +48.8% |
Risk & Volatility
LEVI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LEVI is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RL's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.82 | $393.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.50 | $246.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.5 | 44.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 534K |
Analyst Outlook
LEVI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LEVI as "Buy" and RL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.0% upside for LEVI (target: $28) vs 19.7% for RL (target: $429). For income investors, LEVI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.35% vs RL's 0.88%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.67 | $429.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.53 | $3.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +1.0% |
RL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LEVI leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
LEVI vs RL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LEVI or RL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the stronger pick with 6.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI). Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LEVI or RL?
On trailing P/E, Levi Strauss & Co.
(LEVI) is the cheapest at 15. 6x versus Ralph Lauren Corporation at 30. 9x. On forward P/E, Levi Strauss & Co. is actually cheaper at 15. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LEVI or RL?
Over the past 5 years, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) delivered a total return of +172.
0%, compared to -16. 1% for Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RL returned +324. 6% versus LEVI's +13. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LEVI or RL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Levi Strauss & Co.
(LEVI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus Ralph Lauren Corporation's 1. 53β — meaning RL is approximately 9% more volatile than LEVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 101% versus 103% for Ralph Lauren Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LEVI or RL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is pulling ahead at 6.
7% versus -1. 2% for Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Levi Strauss & Co. grew EPS 178. 8% year-over-year, compared to 19. 4% for Ralph Lauren Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RL leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LEVI or RL?
Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus 9. 2% for Levi Strauss & Co. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RL leads at 13. 2% versus 10. 8% for LEVI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RL leads at 68. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LEVI or RL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Levi Strauss & Co.
(LEVI) trades at 15. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 0x for Ralph Lauren Corporation — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LEVI: 22. 0% to $27. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — LEVI or RL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 0. 9% for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL).
09Is LEVI or RL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
9% yield, +324. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RL: +324. 6%, LEVI: +13. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LEVI and RL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LEVI is a small-cap deep-value stock; RL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.