LILA vs AMX

For growth investors, América Móvil, S.

A. B. de C. V. (AMX) is the stronger pick with 1. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA). América Móvil, S. A. B. de C. V. (AMX) offers the better valuation at 18. 2x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, América Móvil, S.

A. B. de C. V. (AMX) delivered a total return of +258. 8%, compared to -43. 7% for Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMX returned +312. 6% versus LILA's -78. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), América Móvil, S.

A. B. de C. V. (AMX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Liberty Latin America Ltd. 's 0. 71β — meaning LILA is approximately 40% more volatile than AMX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, América Móvil, S. A. B. de C. V. (AMX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 9% for Liberty Latin America Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), América Móvil, S.

A. B. de C. V. (AMX) is pulling ahead at 1. 8% versus -0. 3% for Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: América Móvil, S. A. B. de C. V. grew EPS 248. 6% year-over-year, compared to 8. 4% for Liberty Latin America Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMX leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

América Móvil, S.

A. B. de C. V. (AMX) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus -13. 8% for Liberty Latin America Ltd. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMX leads at 21. 0% versus 16. 2% for LILA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LILA leads at 57. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMX: -1.

3% to $26. 75.

In this comparison, AMX (2.

2% yield) pays a dividend. LILA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, América Móvil, S.

A. B. de C. V. (AMX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 2. 2% yield, +312. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMX: +312. 6%, LILA: -78. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

AMX pays a dividend while LILA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.