Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LND vs FPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
LND vs FPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $383M | $466M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $821M | $54M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-82M | $30M |
| Gross Margin | 36.4% | 78.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 45.6% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | 50.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.31B | $161M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $160M | $9M |
LND vs FPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrasilAgro - Compan… (LND) | 100 | 100.8 | +0.8% |
| Farmland Partners I… (FPI) | 100 | 154.8 | +54.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LND vs FPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LND carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth -39.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.2%
- 109.0% 10Y total return vs FPI's 33.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 60.2%, current ratio 1.79x
FPI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 11.6%
- Beta 0.56, yield 11.6%, current ratio 537.08x
- 56.0% margin vs LND's -10.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.8% revenue growth vs FPI's -10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 50.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 56.0% margin vs LND's -10.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs FPI's 0.56 | |
| Dividends | 11.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LND's 8.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.0% vs FPI's +9.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs LND's -2.1%, ROIC 2.4% vs 2.1% |
LND vs FPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LND vs FPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FPI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LND is the larger business by revenue, generating $821M annually — 15.3x FPI's $54M. FPI is the more profitable business, keeping 56.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LND's -10.0%. On growth, FPI holds the edge at -1.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $821M | $54M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $150M | $28M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$82M | $30M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $74M | $19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.4% | +78.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +45.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.0% | +56.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +35.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -57.1% | -1.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -97.3% | -64.2% |
Valuation Metrics
LND leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.7x trailing earnings, LND trades at a 20% valuation discount to FPI's 17.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FPI's 22.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LND's 28.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $383M | $466M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $616M | $618M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.74x | 17.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 50.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.48x | 22.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.79x | 8.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 1.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.84x | 26.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FPI leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FPI delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-4 for LND. FPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LND's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FPI scores 6/9 vs LND's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.9% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $152M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $160M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $161M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.10x | 4.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FPI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FPI five years ago would be worth $9,699 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,613 for LND. Over the past 12 months, LND leads with a +10.0% total return vs FPI's +9.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FPI at 6.2% vs LND's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.3% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.0% | +9.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.4% | +19.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.9% | -3.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.0% | +33.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.1% | +6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
LND leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LND is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FPI's 0.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LND currently trades 86.6% from its 52-week high vs FPI's 80.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.43 | $13.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.47 | $9.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.6% | +80.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 29.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 108K | 408K |
Analyst Outlook
FPI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, FPI offers the higher dividend yield at 11.64% vs LND's 8.21%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.2% | +11.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.56 | $1.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.2% |
FPI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LND leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
LND vs FPI: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LND or FPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the stronger pick with 3.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI). BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LND or FPI?
On trailing P/E, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the cheapest at 13.
7x versus Farmland Partners Inc. at 17. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LND or FPI?
Over the past 5 years, Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) delivered a total return of -3. 0%, compared to -3. 9% for BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LND returned +109. 0% versus FPI's +33. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LND or FPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus Farmland Partners Inc. 's 0. 56β — meaning FPI is approximately 13% more volatile than LND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 60% for BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LND or FPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is pulling ahead at 3.
8% versus -10. 4% for Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas grew EPS -39. 2% year-over-year, compared to -41. 5% for Farmland Partners Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FPI leads at -5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LND or FPI?
Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 5% net margin versus 13. 1% for BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas — meaning it keeps 60. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FPI leads at 44. 2% versus 8. 4% for LND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FPI leads at 64. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — LND or FPI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) offers the highest yield at 11. 6%, versus 8. 2% for BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND).
08Is LND or FPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
50), 8. 2% yield, +109. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LND: +109. 0%, FPI: +33. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LND and FPI?
These companies operate in different sectors (LND (Consumer Defensive) and FPI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.