Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LPCN vs NUVB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
LPCN vs NUVB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $13M | $1.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $143M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-146M |
| Gross Margin | -13.4% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -413.6% | -105.0% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $164M |
LPCN vs NUVB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lipocine Inc. (LPCN) | 100 | 9.5 | -90.5% |
| Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LPCN vs NUVB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LPCN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.86
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, current ratio 6.68x
- Beta 0.86, current ratio 6.68x
NUVB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 71.6%
- -51.8% 10Y total return vs LPCN's -98.4%
- 7.0% revenue growth vs LPCN's -82.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs LPCN's -82.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -102.1% margin vs LPCN's -5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs NUVB's 2.04 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.3% vs LPCN's -27.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -23.8% ROA vs LPCN's -59.4%, ROIC -54.3% vs -64.7% |
LPCN vs NUVB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LPCN vs NUVB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUVB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUVB is the larger business by revenue, generating $143M annually — 71.4x LPCN's $2M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -102.1% (NUVB) to -5.7% (LPCN).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $143M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$146M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -105.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | -102.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | -88.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.2% | +26.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -54.3% | +106.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LPCN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.41x | -8.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.58x | 26.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 5.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NUVB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NUVB delivers a -44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-44 in annual profit, vs $-67 for LPCN. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NUVB scores 4/9 vs LPCN's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -66.7% | -44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -59.4% | -23.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -64.7% | -54.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.5% | -42.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$154M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $164M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -162.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVB five years ago would be worth $4,173 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,011 for LPCN. Over the past 12 months, NUVB leads with a +136.3% total return vs LPCN's -27.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVB at 43.8% vs LPCN's -16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.1% | -43.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.6% | +136.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | +197.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.9% | -58.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -51.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.7% | +43.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LPCN and NUVB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LPCN is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUVB's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVB currently trades 49.4% from its 52-week high vs LPCN's 19.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.37 | $9.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.81 | $1.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.3% | +49.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.1 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 463K | 4.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NUVB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LPCN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LPCN vs NUVB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPCN or NUVB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is the stronger pick with 699. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -82. 3% for Lipocine Inc. (LPCN). Analysts rate Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LPCN or NUVB?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) delivered a total return of -58. 3%, compared to -89. 9% for Lipocine Inc. (LPCN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVB returned -51. 8% versus LPCN's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LPCN or NUVB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lipocine Inc.
(LPCN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Nuvation Bio Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning NUVB is approximately 137% more volatile than LPCN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LPCN or NUVB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is pulling ahead at 699. 0% versus -82. 3% for Lipocine Inc. (LPCN). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LPCN or NUVB?
Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is the more profitable company, earning -325. 3% net margin versus -487. 1% for Lipocine Inc. — meaning it keeps -325. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NUVB leads at -338. 7% versus -524. 7% for LPCN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NUVB leads at 86. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LPCN or NUVB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LPCN or NUVB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lipocine Inc.
(LPCN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86)). Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LPCN: -98. 4%, NUVB: -51. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LPCN and NUVB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LPCN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NUVB is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.