Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LRN vs LAUR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LRN
Stride, Inc.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.90B
5Y Perf.+272.4%
LAUR
Laureate Education, Inc.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.59B
5Y Perf.+230.6%

LRN vs LAUR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LRN logoLRN
LAUR logoLAUR
IndustryEducation & Training ServicesEducation & Training Services
Market Cap$3.90B$4.59B
Revenue (TTM)$2.54B$1.74B
Net Income (TTM)$308M$280M
Gross Margin38.3%26.9%
Operating Margin15.8%24.0%
Forward P/E13.0x15.3x
Total Debt$550M$847M
Cash & Equiv.$782M$147M

LRN vs LAURLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LRN
LAUR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Stride, Inc. (LRN)100372.4+272.4%
Laureate Education,… (LAUR)100330.6+230.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LRN vs LAUR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LRN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Laureate Education, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LRN
Stride, Inc.
The Income Pick

LRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.46
  • Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 26.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
  • 6.7% 10Y total return vs LAUR's 216.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
LAUR
Laureate Education, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

LAUR is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and momentum.

  • 16.1% margin vs LRN's 12.2%
  • +40.7% vs LRN's -42.3%
Best for: quality and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLRN logoLRN17.9% revenue growth vs LAUR's 8.6%
ValueLRN logoLRNLower P/E (13.0x vs 15.3x)
Quality / MarginsLAUR logoLAUR16.1% margin vs LRN's 12.2%
Stability / SafetyLRN logoLRNBeta 0.46 vs LAUR's 0.59, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LAUR logoLAUR+40.7% vs LRN's -42.3%
Efficiency (ROA)LRN logoLRN13.1% ROA vs LAUR's 12.9%, ROIC 22.0% vs 20.3%

LRN vs LAUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LRNStride, Inc.
FY 2025
General Education
43.1%$1.4B
Career Learning
28.5%$957M
Middle - High School
26.1%$876M
Adult
2.4%$80M
LAURLaureate Education, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Services
0.0%$225M
Sales Discounts, Waivers And Scholarships
0.0%$-569,457,000

LRN vs LAUR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLRNLAGGINGLAUR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LRN and LAUR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LRN and LAUR operate at a comparable scale, with $2.5B and $1.7B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.1% (LAUR) to 12.2% (LRN). On growth, LAUR holds the edge at +15.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLRN logoLRNStride, Inc.LAUR logoLAURLaureate Educatio…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.5B$1.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$525M$535M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$308M$280M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$400M$264M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.3%+26.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.8%+24.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.2%+16.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.8%+15.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.7%+15.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.4%-15.4%
Evenly matched — LRN and LAUR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LRN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.4x trailing earnings, LRN trades at a 9% valuation discount to LAUR's 17.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LRN's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LAUR's 9.8x.

MetricLRN logoLRNStride, Inc.LAUR logoLAURLaureate Educatio…
Market CapShares × price$3.9B$4.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.7B$5.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.41x17.02x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.02x15.26x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.26x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.73x9.77x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.62x2.70x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.00x4.02x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.47x17.45x
LRN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LRN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

LAUR delivers a 25.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $20 for LRN. LRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LAUR's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LRN scores 7/9 vs LAUR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLRN logoLRNStride, Inc.LAUR logoLAURLaureate Educatio…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+19.9%+25.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+13.1%+12.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+22.0%+20.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+19.6%+26.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.37x0.71x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$233M$701M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$782M$147M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$550M$847M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense36.09x34.91x
LRN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — LRN and LAUR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LRN five years ago would be worth $32,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $30,043 for LAUR. Over the past 12 months, LAUR leads with a +40.7% total return vs LRN's -42.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LAUR at 40.1% vs LRN's 30.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLRN logoLRNStride, Inc.LAUR logoLAURLaureate Educatio…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+41.9%-3.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-42.3%+40.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+122.2%+175.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+223.1%+200.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+666.0%+216.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.5%+40.1%
Evenly matched — LRN and LAUR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LRN and LAUR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LAUR's 0.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LAUR currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs LRN's 53.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLRN logoLRNStride, Inc.LAUR logoLAURLaureate Educatio…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.46x0.59x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$171.17$37.91
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$60.61$21.16
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+53.6%+84.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.449.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded744K1.9M
Evenly matched — LRN and LAUR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LRN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates LRN as "Hold" and LAUR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for LAUR (target: $39) vs 19.4% for LRN (target: $110).

MetricLRN logoLRNStride, Inc.LAUR logoLAURLaureate Educatio…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$109.50$39.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1711
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.5%+4.7%
LRN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LRN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallStride, Inc. (LRN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LRN vs LAUR: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LRN or LAUR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Stride, Inc.

(LRN) is the stronger pick with 17. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 6% for Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR). Stride, Inc. (LRN) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LRN or LAUR?

On trailing P/E, Stride, Inc.

(LRN) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus Laureate Education, Inc. at 17. 0x. On forward P/E, Stride, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LRN or LAUR?

Over the past 5 years, Stride, Inc.

(LRN) delivered a total return of +223. 1%, compared to +200. 4% for Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LRN returned +666. 0% versus LAUR's +216. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LRN or LAUR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stride, Inc.

(LRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Laureate Education, Inc. 's 0. 59β — meaning LAUR is approximately 28% more volatile than LRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stride, Inc. (LRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 71% for Laureate Education, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LRN or LAUR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stride, Inc.

(LRN) is pulling ahead at 17. 9% versus 8. 6% for Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stride, Inc. grew EPS 26. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1. 6% for Laureate Education, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LRN leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LRN or LAUR?

Laureate Education, Inc.

(LAUR) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus 12. 0% for Stride, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAUR leads at 25. 3% versus 15. 0% for LRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LRN leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LRN or LAUR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Stride, Inc.

(LRN) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Laureate Education, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAUR: 21. 2% to $39. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LRN or LAUR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is LRN or LAUR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Stride, Inc.

(LRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), +666. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LRN: +666. 0%, LAUR: +216. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LRN and LAUR?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LRN is a small-cap high-growth stock; LAUR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

LRN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LAUR

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LRN and LAUR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LRN: 2.7% · LAUR: 15.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(LRN: 12.2% · LAUR: 16.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LRN: 15.4x · LAUR: 17.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.