Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MHH vs ICFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
MHH vs ICFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $83M | $1.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $197M | $1.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-66K | $85M |
| Gross Margin | 27.6% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 25.3x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $571M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $5M |
MHH vs ICFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mastech Digital, In… (MHH) | 100 | 38.4 | -61.6% |
| ICF International, … (ICFI) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MHH vs ICFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MHH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.43
- Rev growth -1.1%, EPS growth 145.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.6%
- 105.5% 10Y total return vs ICFI's 88.1%
ICFI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 25.3x)
- 4.7% margin vs MHH's -0.0%
- 0.8% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.1% revenue growth vs ICFI's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.7% margin vs MHH's -0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs ICFI's 0.56, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -9.8% vs ICFI's -19.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs MHH's -0.1%, ROIC 7.2% vs 4.4% |
MHH vs ICFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MHH vs ICFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 9.3x MHH's $197M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.7% (ICFI) to -0.0% (MHH). On growth, MHH holds the edge at -6.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $197M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $201M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$66,000 | $85M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.6% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | -10.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | -22.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MHH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, ICFI trades at a 44% valuation discount to MHH's 25.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MHH's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ICFI's 8.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $83M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $59M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.32x | 14.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.09x | 8.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.27x | 10.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MHH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ICFI delivers a 8.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-0 for MHH. MHH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICFI's 0.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MHH scores 7/9 vs ICFI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $571M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.69x | 6.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MHH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ICFI five years ago would be worth $7,842 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,545 for MHH. Over the past 12 months, MHH leads with a -9.8% total return vs ICFI's -19.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MHH at -8.2% vs ICFI's -14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.0% | -18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.8% | -19.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.7% | -36.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.6% | -21.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.5% | +88.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.2% | -14.0% |
Risk & Volatility
MHH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MHH is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICFI's 0.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MHH currently trades 74.8% from its 52-week high vs ICFI's 68.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.48 | $101.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.51 | $64.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.8% | +68.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 62.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 360K |
Analyst Outlook
ICFI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
ICFI is the only dividend payer here at 0.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $102.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +4.4% |
MHH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ICFI leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook).
MHH vs ICFI: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MHH or ICFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mastech Digital, Inc.
(MHH) is the stronger pick with -1. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MHH or ICFI?
On trailing P/E, ICF International, Inc.
(ICFI) is the cheapest at 14. 1x versus Mastech Digital, Inc. at 25. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MHH or ICFI?
Over the past 5 years, ICF International, Inc.
(ICFI) delivered a total return of -21. 6%, compared to -54. 6% for Mastech Digital, Inc. (MHH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MHH returned +105. 5% versus ICFI's +88. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MHH or ICFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastech Digital, Inc.
(MHH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus ICF International, Inc. 's 0. 56β — meaning ICFI is approximately 30% more volatile than MHH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mastech Digital, Inc. (MHH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 56% for ICF International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MHH or ICFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mastech Digital, Inc.
(MHH) is pulling ahead at -1. 1% versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mastech Digital, Inc. grew EPS 145. 9% year-over-year, compared to -14. 9% for ICF International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ICFI leads at 1. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MHH or ICFI?
ICF International, Inc.
(ICFI) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 9% net margin versus 1. 7% for Mastech Digital, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICFI leads at 8. 1% versus 1. 9% for MHH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICFI leads at 34. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MHH or ICFI?
In this comparison, ICFI (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. MHH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MHH or ICFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ICF International, Inc.
(ICFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICFI: +88. 1%, MHH: +105. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MHH and ICFI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MHH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICFI is a small-cap deep-value stock. ICFI pays a dividend while MHH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.