Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MLSS vs XRAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
MLSS vs XRAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $36M | $2.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $3.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-628M |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 48.9% |
| Operating Margin | -77.0% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.7x |
| Total Debt | $349K | $2.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $326M |
MLSS vs XRAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone Scientifi… (MLSS) | 100 | 24.8 | -75.2% |
| DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc. (XRAY) | 100 | 23.6 | -76.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLSS vs XRAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLSS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.85
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 2.48x
- Beta 0.85, current ratio 2.48x
XRAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -3.0%, EPS growth 33.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.1%
- -74.4% 10Y total return vs MLSS's -80.4%
- -3.0% revenue growth vs MLSS's -12.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.0% revenue growth vs MLSS's -12.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -17.1% margin vs MLSS's -76.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs XRAY's 1.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.8% yield; 23-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -27.8% vs MLSS's -52.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -11.2% ROA vs MLSS's -86.6%, ROIC 5.1% vs -121.3% |
MLSS vs XRAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MLSS vs XRAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XRAY leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XRAY is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 405.3x MLSS's $9M. XRAY is the more profitable business, keeping -17.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MLSS's -76.8%. On growth, MLSS holds the edge at +25.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $424M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$628M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $104M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +48.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -77.0% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -76.8% | -17.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.9% | +2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.3% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -150.0% |
Valuation Metrics
XRAY leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.73x | -3.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | 0.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.25x | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XRAY leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XRAY delivers a -41.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-41 in annual profit, vs $-2 for MLSS. MLSS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XRAY's 1.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XRAY scores 6/9 vs MLSS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -41.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -86.6% | -11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -121.3% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -94.2% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 1.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $326M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $349,054 | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -5.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MLSS and XRAY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XRAY five years ago would be worth $1,978 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,945 for MLSS. Over the past 12 months, XRAY leads with a -27.8% total return vs MLSS's -52.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MLSS at -15.2% vs XRAY's -32.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +57.6% | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.9% | -27.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.1% | -69.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.6% | -80.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.4% | -74.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.2% | -32.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MLSS and XRAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MLSS is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XRAY's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XRAY currently trades 64.0% from its 52-week high vs MLSS's 43.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.05 | $17.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $9.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.5% | +64.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.7 | 37.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 4.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
XRAY is the only dividend payer here at 5.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
XRAY leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
MLSS vs XRAY: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLSS or XRAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc.
(XRAY) is the stronger pick with -3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 2% for Milestone Scientific Inc. (MLSS). Analysts rate DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc. (XRAY) a "Hold" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MLSS or XRAY?
Over the past 5 years, DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc.
(XRAY) delivered a total return of -80. 2%, compared to -80. 6% for Milestone Scientific Inc. (MLSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XRAY returned -74. 4% versus MLSS's -80. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MLSS or XRAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Milestone Scientific Inc.
(MLSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning XRAY is approximately 101% more volatile than MLSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Milestone Scientific Inc. (MLSS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 184% for DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MLSS or XRAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc.
(XRAY) is pulling ahead at -3. 0% versus -12. 2% for Milestone Scientific Inc. (MLSS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Milestone Scientific Inc. grew EPS 37. 9% year-over-year, compared to 33. 0% for DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XRAY leads at -2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MLSS or XRAY?
DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc.
(XRAY) is the more profitable company, earning -16. 3% net margin versus -54. 6% for Milestone Scientific Inc. — meaning it keeps -16. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XRAY leads at 6. 8% versus -78. 3% for MLSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MLSS leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MLSS or XRAY?
In this comparison, XRAY (5.
8% yield) pays a dividend. MLSS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is MLSS or XRAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Milestone Scientific Inc.
(MLSS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85)). DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc. (XRAY) carries a higher beta of 1. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MLSS: -80. 4%, XRAY: -74. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MLSS and XRAY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MLSS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XRAY is a small-cap income-oriented stock. XRAY pays a dividend while MLSS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.