Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MNOV vs NRXP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
MNOV vs NRXP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $71M | $84M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $410K | $242K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-38M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | -32.4% | -63.0% |
| Total Debt | $194K | $631K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $8M |
MNOV vs NRXP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MediciNova, Inc. (MNOV) | 100 | 27.2 | -72.8% |
| NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP) | 100 | 2.8 | -97.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNOV vs NRXP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MNOV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.31
- -79.0% 10Y total return vs NRXP's -96.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 8.16x
NRXP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 43.9%
- 101.1% revenue growth vs MNOV's -8.8%
- +58.9% vs MNOV's -2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 101.1% revenue growth vs MNOV's -8.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -29.3% margin vs NRXP's -157.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs NRXP's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.9% vs MNOV's -2.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -26.3% ROA vs NRXP's -489.9% |
MNOV vs NRXP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MNOV vs NRXP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNOV leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNOV is the larger business by revenue, generating $409,657 annually — 1.7x NRXP's $242,000. MNOV is the more profitable business, keeping -29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRXP's -157.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $409,657 | $242,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | -$31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$38M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$12M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +59.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.4% | -63.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.3% | -157.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.9% | -49.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | -80.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNOV and NRXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $71M | $84M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $77M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.04x | -2.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 173.60x | 68.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.71x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNOV leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRXP scores 5/9 vs MNOV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.3% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -85.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.0% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $194,331 | $631,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -24.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNOV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNOV five years ago would be worth $3,625 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $99 for NRXP. Over the past 12 months, NRXP leads with a +58.9% total return vs MNOV's -2.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNOV at -12.8% vs NRXP's -21.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.0% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.0% | +58.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.8% | -50.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.7% | -99.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.0% | -96.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.8% | -21.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNOV and NRXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNOV is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRXP's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NRXP currently trades 79.4% from its 52-week high vs MNOV's 74.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 1.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.96 | $3.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.17 | $1.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.0% | +79.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.6 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49K | 914K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MNOV leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
MNOV vs NRXP: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — MNOV or NRXP?
Over the past 5 years, MediciNova, Inc.
(MNOV) delivered a total return of -63. 7%, compared to -99. 0% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNOV returned -79. 0% versus NRXP's -96. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — MNOV or NRXP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MediciNova, Inc.
(MNOV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning NRXP is approximately 517% more volatile than MNOV relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — MNOV or NRXP?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 43. 9% year-over-year, compared to -4. 3% for MediciNova, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — MNOV or NRXP?
NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(NRXP) is the more profitable company, earning -23. 4% net margin versus -29. 3% for MediciNova, Inc. — meaning it keeps -23. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NRXP leads at -1324. 4% versus -32. 4% for MNOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NRXP leads at 59. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — MNOV or NRXP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is MNOV or NRXP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MediciNova, Inc.
(MNOV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31)). NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNOV: -79. 0%, NRXP: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between MNOV and NRXP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.