MNRO
Monro, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$534M
5Y Perf.-67.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MNRO vs ABG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ABG
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Auto - Dealerships
Market Cap$3.81B
5Y Perf.+173.5%
MNRO vs ABG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MNRO | ABG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $534M | $3.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.18B | $17.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $408M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 16.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.3% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 33.1x | 7.6x |
| Total Debt | $529M | $6.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $40M |
MNRO vs ABG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MNRO
ABG
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monro, Inc. (MNRO) | 100 | 32.3 | -67.7% |
| Asbury Automotive G… (ABG) | 100 | 273.5 | +173.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MNRO vs ABG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ABG leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Monro, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MNRO
Monro, Inc.
The Income Pick
MNRO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.50, yield 6.3%
- 6.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +41.6% vs ABG's -10.2%
Best for: income & stability
ABG
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
The Growth Play
ABG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 251.9% 10Y total return vs MNRO's -61.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, current ratio 0.95x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ABG | 4.7% revenue growth vs MNRO's -6.4% |
| Value | ABG | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 33.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | ABG | 2.3% margin vs MNRO's -1.1% |
| Stability / Safety | ABG | Beta 1.04 vs MNRO's 1.50 |
| Dividends | MNRO | 6.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MNRO | +41.6% vs ABG's -10.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ABG | 4.4% ROA vs MNRO's -0.8%, ROIC 8.0% vs 2.5% |
MNRO vs ABG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
MNRO vs ABG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLABGLAGGINGMNRO
MNROMonro, Inc.
1leads
ABGAsbury Automotive Gro…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MNROMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ABG6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ABG4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
MNRO1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MNRO and ABG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABG is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 15.2x MNRO's $1.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.3% (ABG) to -1.1% (MNRO). On growth, ABG holds the edge at -0.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MNROMonro, Inc. | ABGAsbury Automotive… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $18.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $408M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $50M | $651M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +16.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.0% | -0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +150.0% | +47.2% |
Evenly matched — MNRO and ABG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNRO and ABG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ABG's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNRO's 9.5x.
| Metric | MNROMonro, Inc. | ABGAsbury Automotive… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $534M | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $10.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -80.86x | 7.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.07x | 7.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.51x | 9.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 0.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 0.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.06x | 6.62x |
Evenly matched — MNRO and ABG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABG delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-2 for MNRO. MNRO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ABG's 1.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABG scores 5/9 vs MNRO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MNROMonro, Inc. | ABGAsbury Automotive… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +14.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +12.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 1.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $509M | $6.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $529M | $6.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.09x | 3.15x |
ABG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABG five years ago would be worth $9,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,318 for MNRO. Over the past 12 months, MNRO leads with a +41.6% total return vs ABG's -10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABG at -0.7% vs MNRO's -24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MNROMonro, Inc. | ABGAsbury Automotive… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.3% | -15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.6% | -10.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.0% | -2.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.8% | -5.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.1% | +251.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.5% | -0.7% |
ABG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNRO and ABG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABG is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNRO's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | MNROMonro, Inc. | ABGAsbury Automotive… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.91 | $274.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.20 | $184.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.4% | +72.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 760K | 249K |
Evenly matched — MNRO and ABG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
MNRO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MNRO as "Hold" and ABG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 124.8% upside for MNRO (target: $40) vs 20.4% for ABG (target: $238). MNRO is the only dividend payer here at 6.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | MNROMonro, Inc. | ABGAsbury Automotive… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $238.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.12 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.0% |
MNRO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
ABG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MNRO leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
Best OverallAsbury Automotive Group, In… (ABG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MNRO vs ABG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNRO or ABG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
(ABG) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Monro, Inc. (MNRO). Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monro, Inc. (MNRO) a "Hold" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNRO or ABG?
On forward P/E, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNRO or ABG?
Over the past 5 years, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
(ABG) delivered a total return of -5. 5%, compared to -66. 8% for Monro, Inc. (MNRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABG returned +251. 9% versus MNRO's -61. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNRO or ABG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
(ABG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Monro, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning MNRO is approximately 44% more volatile than ABG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monro, Inc. (MNRO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 163% for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MNRO or ABG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
(ABG) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -6. 4% for Monro, Inc. (MNRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. grew EPS 16. 9% year-over-year, compared to -119. 3% for Monro, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ABG leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MNRO or ABG?
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
(ABG) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 7% net margin versus -0. 4% for Monro, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABG leads at 5. 6% versus 3. 4% for MNRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNRO leads at 34. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MNRO or ABG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
(ABG) trades at 7. 6x forward P/E versus 33. 1x for Monro, Inc. — 25. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNRO: 124. 8% to $40. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MNRO or ABG?
In this comparison, MNRO (6.
3% yield) pays a dividend. ABG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MNRO or ABG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
(ABG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +251. 9% 10Y return). Monro, Inc. (MNRO) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABG: +251. 9%, MNRO: -61. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MNRO and ABG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MNRO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ABG is a small-cap deep-value stock. MNRO pays a dividend while ABG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MNRO: -4.0% · ABG: -0.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.