MODD vs TNDM

Analysts rate Modular Medical, Inc.

(MODD) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.

(TNDM) delivered a total return of -78. 0%, compared to -96. 5% for Modular Medical, Inc. (MODD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TNDM returned -75. 4% versus MODD's -96. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Modular Medical, Inc.

(MODD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 41β versus Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning TNDM is approximately 3% more volatile than MODD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Modular Medical, Inc. (MODD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Modular Medical, Inc.

grew EPS 34. 6% year-over-year, compared to -106. 8% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Modular Medical, Inc.

(MODD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -20. 2% for Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MODD leads at 0. 0% versus -7. 7% for TNDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TNDM leads at 52. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Modular Medical, Inc.

(MODD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MODD: -96. 5%, TNDM: -75. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.