Leisure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MODG vs GOLF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
MODG vs GOLF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $2.32B | $5.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.06B | $2.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.50B | $171M |
| Gross Margin | 64.6% | 47.5% |
| Operating Margin | -31.0% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.14B | $1.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $445M | $50M |
MODG vs GOLF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topgolf Callaway Br… (MODG) | 100 | 82.2 | -17.8% |
| Acushnet Holdings C… (GOLF) | 100 | 290.1 | +190.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MODG vs GOLF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MODG is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Better valuation composite
- +83.3% vs GOLF's +33.7%
GOLF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth -8.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.1%
- 414.5% 10Y total return vs MODG's 37.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.1% revenue growth vs MODG's -1.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs MODG's -37.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.17 vs MODG's 1.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.3% vs GOLF's +33.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.0% ROA vs MODG's -19.9%, ROIC 13.3% vs -13.8% |
MODG vs GOLF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MODG vs GOLF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOLF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MODG is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 1.6x GOLF's $2.6B. GOLF is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MODG's -37.1%. On growth, GOLF holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.1B | $2.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$989M | $342M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.5B | $171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $35M | $89M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.6% | +47.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.0% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -37.1% | +6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +3.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.8% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.1% | -16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MODG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $5.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.60x | 27.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 1.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 6.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.73x | 41.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOLF leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOLF delivers a 20.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-61 for MODG. GOLF carries lower financial leverage with a 1.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MODG's 1.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MODG scores 6/9 vs GOLF's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.8% | +20.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.9% | +7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.8% | +13.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.8% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.72x | 1.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $445M | $50M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.38x | 3.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOLF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOLF five years ago would be worth $17,459 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,069 for MODG. Over the past 12 months, MODG leads with a +83.3% total return vs GOLF's +33.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOLF at 19.3% vs MODG's -16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.4% | +5.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +83.3% | +33.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.4% | +69.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.3% | +74.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.1% | +414.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.8% | +19.3% |
Risk & Volatility
GOLF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOLF is the less volatile stock with a 1.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MODG's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOLF currently trades 82.0% from its 52-week high vs MODG's 75.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.65 | $104.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.87 | $64.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.6% | +82.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.2 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.2M | 303K |
Analyst Outlook
GOLF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MODG as "Buy" and GOLF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.2% upside for MODG (target: $15) vs 7.6% for GOLF (target: $93). GOLF is the only dividend payer here at 1.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $92.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +4.2% |
GOLF leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MODG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MODG vs GOLF: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MODG or GOLF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is the stronger pick with 4. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 1% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG). Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) offers the better valuation at 27. 7x trailing P/E (23. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MODG or GOLF?
Over the past 5 years, Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) delivered a total return of +74. 6%, compared to -59. 3% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOLF returned +414. 5% versus MODG's +37. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MODG or GOLF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 17β versus Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. 's 1. 92β — meaning MODG is approximately 63% more volatile than GOLF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 137% versus 172% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MODG or GOLF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is pulling ahead at 4. 1% versus -1. 1% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Acushnet Holdings Corp. grew EPS -8. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1776. 6% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MODG leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MODG or GOLF?
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -34. 1% for Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOLF leads at 11. 5% versus -29. 7% for MODG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MODG leads at 62. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MODG or GOLF more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MODG: 15.
2% to $14. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — MODG or GOLF?
In this comparison, GOLF (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. MODG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MODG or GOLF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Acushnet Holdings Corp.
(GOLF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 1. 1% yield, +414. 5% 10Y return). Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (MODG) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOLF: +414. 5%, MODG: +37. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MODG and GOLF?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
GOLF pays a dividend while MODG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.