Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MOVE vs AEYE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
MOVE vs AEYE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $816M | $94M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $500K | $40M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-3M |
| Gross Margin | -270.2% | 78.3% |
| Operating Margin | -31.6% | -7.9% |
| Total Debt | $186K | $721K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $5M |
MOVE vs AEYE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Movano Inc. (MOVE) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 27.0 | -73.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOVE vs AEYE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOVE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.98
- Lower volatility, beta 1.98, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 3.02x
- Beta 1.98, current ratio 3.02x
AEYE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.5%, EPS growth 30.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- 67.6% 10Y total return vs MOVE's -98.6%
- 14.5% revenue growth vs MOVE's -44.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.5% revenue growth vs MOVE's -44.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -7.6% margin vs MOVE's -34.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.98 vs AEYE's 2.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs AEYE's -37.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.5% ROA vs MOVE's -306.8% |
MOVE vs AEYE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MOVE vs AEYE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEYE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEYE is the larger business by revenue, generating $40M annually — 80.6x MOVE's $500,000. AEYE is the more profitable business, keeping -7.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOVE's -34.1%. On growth, MOVE holds the edge at +60.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $500,000 | $40M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | -$504,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.6% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -34.1% | -7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.1% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.0% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.0% | +29.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AEYE leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $816M | $94M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $808M | $89M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -34.72x | -30.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 805.09x | 2.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 110.89x | 19.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MOVE and AEYE each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AEYE delivers a -47.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-48 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MOVE. MOVE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEYE's 0.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOVE scores 6/9 vs AEYE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.4% | -47.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | -9.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -42.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.3% | -17.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $186,000 | $721,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.38x | -2.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEYE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEYE five years ago would be worth $3,284 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $168 for MOVE. Over the past 12 months, MOVE leads with a +52.1% total return vs AEYE's -37.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEYE at 6.3% vs MOVE's -56.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.2% | -24.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.1% | -37.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.7% | +20.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | -67.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +67.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.4% | +6.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOVE and AEYE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOVE is the less volatile stock with a 1.98 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AEYE currently trades 46.0% from its 52-week high vs MOVE's 38.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.98x | 2.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.87 | $16.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.67 | $5.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.8% | +46.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.6 | 65.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 70K | 194K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AEYE leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
MOVE vs AEYE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOVE or AEYE a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Movano Inc.
(MOVE) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MOVE or AEYE?
Over the past 5 years, AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) delivered a total return of -67. 2%, compared to -98. 3% for Movano Inc. (MOVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +67. 6% versus MOVE's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MOVE or AEYE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Movano Inc.
(MOVE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 98β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 16% more volatile than MOVE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Movano Inc. (MOVE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 15% for AudioEye, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MOVE or AEYE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Movano Inc.
grew EPS 38. 1% year-over-year, compared to 30. 6% for AudioEye, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MOVE or AEYE?
AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) is the more profitable company, earning -7. 6% net margin versus -23. 4% for Movano Inc. — meaning it keeps -7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEYE leads at -7. 9% versus -23. 9% for MOVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MOVE or AEYE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MOVE or AEYE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Movano Inc. (MOVE) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEYE: +67. 6%, MOVE: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MOVE and AEYE?
These companies operate in different sectors (MOVE (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare MOVE vs MNMD
MNMD is one of the most direct listed alternatives to MOVE.
Compare AEYE vs ALKT
ALKT is one of the most direct listed alternatives to AEYE.
Expand With GOOGL + MNMD
GOOGL and MNMD are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.