Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MPAA vs SMP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
MPAA vs SMP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $223M | $861M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $771M | $1.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $46M |
| Gross Margin | 19.2% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 10.1% |
| Forward P/E | 15.5x | 8.8x |
| Total Debt | $201M | $682M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $72M |
MPAA vs SMP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motorcar Parts of A… (MPAA) | 100 | 73.5 | -26.5% |
| Standard Motor Prod… (SMP) | 100 | 91.4 | -8.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPAA vs SMP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, MPAA is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
SMP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth 22.4%, EPS growth -23.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
- 28.5% 10Y total return vs MPAA's -62.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.4% revenue growth vs MPAA's 5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 15.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs MPAA's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs MPAA's 0.99 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.3% vs MPAA's +28.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs MPAA's 0.2%, ROIC 10.8% vs 6.2% |
MPAA vs SMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MPAA vs SMP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 2.4x MPAA's $771M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.5% (SMP) to 0.3% (MPAA). On growth, SMP holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $771M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $229M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $46M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $39M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +10.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.9% | +9.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.2% | +33.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MPAA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SMP's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPAA's 8.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $223M | $861M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $415M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.74x | 21.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.49x | 8.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.25x | 6.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 0.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.89x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.46x | 46.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMP leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMP delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $1 for MPAA. MPAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMP's 0.98x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +12.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $192M | $610M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $201M | $682M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | 5.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMP five years ago would be worth $9,469 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,962 for MPAA. Over the past 12 months, SMP leads with a +42.3% total return vs MPAA's +28.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPAA at 35.1% vs SMP's 5.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.0% | +5.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.0% | +42.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.7% | +15.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.4% | -5.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.4% | +28.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.1% | +5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
SMP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMP is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPAA's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMP currently trades 84.5% from its 52-week high vs MPAA's 64.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.12 | $46.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.07 | $27.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.1% | +84.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.1 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 88K | 121K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MPAA as "Buy" and SMP as "Buy". SMP is the only dividend payer here at 3.12% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.21 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | 0.0% |
SMP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MPAA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MPAA vs SMP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPAA or SMP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the stronger pick with 22. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 5% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). Standard Motor Products, Inc. (SMP) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPAA or SMP?
On forward P/E, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 8. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPAA or SMP?
Over the past 5 years, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) delivered a total return of -5. 3%, compared to -50. 4% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMP returned +28. 5% versus MPAA's -62. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPAA or SMP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning MPAA is approximately 21% more volatile than SMP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 98% for Standard Motor Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MPAA or SMP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is pulling ahead at 22. 4% versus 5. 5% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. grew EPS 60. 6% year-over-year, compared to -23. 7% for Standard Motor Products, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMP leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPAA or SMP?
Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 3% net margin versus -2. 6% for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMP leads at 10. 3% versus 5. 3% for MPAA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMP leads at 30. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MPAA or SMP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 5x for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — MPAA or SMP?
In this comparison, SMP (3.
1% yield) pays a dividend. MPAA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MPAA or SMP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Standard Motor Products, Inc.
(SMP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMP: +28. 5%, MPAA: -62. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MPAA and SMP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MPAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMP is a small-cap high-growth stock. SMP pays a dividend while MPAA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.