Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MPWR vs DIOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
MPWR vs DIOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $78.63B | $5.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.79B | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $616M | $86M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 31.3% |
| Operating Margin | 26.1% | 3.5% |
| Forward P/E | 67.2x | 42.6x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $96M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.10B | $367M |
MPWR vs DIOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 763.2 | +663.2% |
| Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) | 100 | 229.1 | +129.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MPWR vs DIOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MPWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.27, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 26.4%, EPS growth -65.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.9%
- 25.3% 10Y total return vs DIOD's 484.5%
DIOD is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.08, current ratio 3.32x
- Lower P/E (42.6x vs 67.2x)
- Beta 2.08 vs MPWR's 2.27
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.4% revenue growth vs DIOD's 13.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (42.6x vs 67.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs DIOD's 5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.08 vs MPWR's 2.27 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +179.0% vs MPWR's +151.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs DIOD's 3.5%, ROIC 22.2% vs 1.6% |
MPWR vs DIOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MPWR vs DIOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 1.8x DIOD's $1.6B. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DIOD's 5.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $781M | $162M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $616M | $86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $664M | $129M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +31.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.8% | +22.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.4% | +4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
DIOD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 77.9x trailing earnings, DIOD trades at a 38% valuation discount to MPWR's 125.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIOD's 27.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPWR's 99.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $78.6B | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $77.6B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 125.56x | 77.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 67.24x | 42.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 99.47x | 27.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 28.18x | 3.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.90x | 2.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 118.03x | 37.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $4 for DIOD. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DIOD's 0.05x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.9% | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.2% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.2% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.4% | +1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | -$272M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $367M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $96M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 66.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $50,422 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,738 for DIOD. Over the past 12 months, DIOD leads with a +179.0% total return vs MPWR's +151.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPWR at 56.9% vs DIOD's 9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +71.2% | +116.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +151.2% | +179.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +286.3% | +32.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +404.2% | +57.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2534.9% | +484.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +56.9% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MPWR and DIOD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DIOD is the less volatile stock with a 2.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPWR's 2.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.27x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1662.00 | $117.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $630.00 | $39.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.3% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 73.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 578K | 546K |
Analyst Outlook
MPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MPWR as "Buy" and DIOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.7% upside for DIOD (target: $120) vs 0.9% for MPWR (target: $1615). MPWR is the only dividend payer here at 0.37% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1615.00 | $120.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.90 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.7% |
MPWR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DIOD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MPWR vs DIOD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MPWR or DIOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 0% for Diodes Incorporated (DIOD). Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) offers the better valuation at 77. 9x trailing P/E (42. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MPWR or DIOD?
On trailing P/E, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is the cheapest at 77.
9x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. at 125. 6x. On forward P/E, Diodes Incorporated is actually cheaper at 42. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MPWR or DIOD?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +404. 2%, compared to +57. 4% for Diodes Incorporated (DIOD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPWR returned +25. 3% versus DIOD's +484. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MPWR or DIOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
08β versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 27β — meaning MPWR is approximately 9% more volatile than DIOD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for Diodes Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MPWR or DIOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus 13. 0% for Diodes Incorporated (DIOD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Diodes Incorporated grew EPS 50. 5% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MPWR or DIOD?
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 4. 5% for Diodes Incorporated — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus 2. 4% for DIOD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MPWR or DIOD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) trades at 42.
6x forward P/E versus 67. 2x for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. — 24. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIOD: 7. 7% to $120. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MPWR or DIOD?
In this comparison, MPWR (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. DIOD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MPWR or DIOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+484.
5% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DIOD: +484. 5%, MPWR: +25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MPWR and DIOD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DIOD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.