MTZ vs MYRG

For growth investors, MasTec, Inc.

(MTZ) is the stronger pick with 16. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) offers the better valuation at 60. 4x trailing P/E (46. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, MYR Group Inc.

(MYRG) is the cheapest at 60. 4x versus MasTec, Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, MYR Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 46. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: MYR Group Inc. wins at 2. 81x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x.

Over the past 5 years, MYR Group Inc.

(MYRG) delivered a total return of +449. 7%, compared to +296. 2% for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MYRG returned +1794% versus MTZ's +1753%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MasTec, Inc.

(MTZ) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 64β versus MYR Group Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning MYRG is approximately 4% more volatile than MTZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 84% for MasTec, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MasTec, Inc.

(MTZ) is pulling ahead at 16. 2% versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to 146. 1% for MasTec, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTZ leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

MYR Group Inc.

(MYRG) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus 2. 8% for MasTec, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTZ leads at 4. 6% versus 4. 4% for MYRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MYRG leads at 11. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 81x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) trades at 46. 8x forward P/E versus 48. 6x for MasTec, Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MYRG: -20. 4% to $362. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, MasTec, Inc.

(MTZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1753% 10Y return). MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) carries a higher beta of 1. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTZ: +1753%, MYRG: +1794%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MTZ is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.