Leisure
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MYCC vs PRKS vs VAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
MYCC vs PRKS vs VAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Leisure | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | — | $1.92B | $3.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.10B | $1.65B | $4.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-426K | $150M | $-342M |
| Gross Margin | 90.7% | 65.4% | 50.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 20.7% | 10.8% |
| Forward P/E | 308.7x | 11.9x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.09B | $2.35B | $5.75B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $100M | $733M |
MYCC vs PRKS vs VAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 283.9 | +183.9% |
| Marriott Vacations … (VAC) | 100 | 108.9 | +8.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYCC vs PRKS vs VAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYCC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.4%, EPS growth 136.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- 3.4% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6%
PRKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.46
- 144.5% 10Y total return vs VAC's 78.1%
- Beta 1.46, current ratio 0.74x
VAC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.68, current ratio 17.74x
- 3.5% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
- +42.5% vs PRKS's -5.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.4% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs VAC's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.46 vs VAC's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.5% vs PRKS's -5.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs VAC's -3.5%, ROIC 15.4% vs 5.7% |
MYCC vs PRKS vs VAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MYCC vs PRKS vs VAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 4.2x MYCC's $1.1B. PRKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VAC's -7.4%. On growth, VAC holds the edge at +4.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $1.7B | $4.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $196M | $520M | $591M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$426,000 | $150M | -$342M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $291M | -$23M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.7% | +65.4% | +50.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +20.7% | +10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +9.1% | -7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +17.6% | -0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -3.0% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.0% | -137.9% | -56.6% |
Valuation Metrics
VAC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, PRKS trades at a 96% valuation discount to MYCC's 308.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VAC's 11.5x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $1.9B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $4.2B | $8.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 308.66x | 13.32x | -10.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.92x | 12.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.67x | 11.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.16x | 0.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.76x | — | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.30x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYCC delivers a -0.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-15 for VAC. VAC carries lower financial leverage with a 2.89x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MYCC's 7.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYCC scores 6/9 vs VAC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.3% | — | -15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | +5.6% | -3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +15.4% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | +16.9% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.63x | — | 2.89x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $2.3B | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $100M | $733M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $2.4B | $5.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.10x | 2.59x | -1.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRKS five years ago would be worth $7,067 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,990 for VAC. Over the past 12 months, VAC leads with a +42.5% total return vs PRKS's -5.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VAC at -8.2% vs PRKS's -10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +12.6% | +54.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | -5.4% | +42.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -28.7% | -22.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -29.3% | -40.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.1% | +144.5% | +78.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -10.7% | -8.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRKS and VAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VAC's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VAC currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs PRKS's 71.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.46x | 1.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | — | $56.95 | $91.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | — | $28.77 | $44.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +71.6% | +97.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 62.2 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | — | 944K | 471K |
Analyst Outlook
VAC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRKS as "Buy", VAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.0% upside for PRKS (target: $49) vs 1.3% for VAC (target: $91). VAC is the only dividend payer here at 3.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $49.33 | $90.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +0.9% | +2.0% |
VAC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). PRKS leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
MYCC vs PRKS vs VAC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYCC or PRKS or VAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ClubCorp Holdings, Inc.
(MYCC) is the stronger pick with 3. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYCC or PRKS or VAC?
On trailing P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus ClubCorp Holdings, Inc. at 308. 7x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYCC or PRKS or VAC?
Over the past 5 years, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) delivered a total return of -29. 3%, compared to -40. 1% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRKS returned +153. 0% versus MYCC's +30. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYCC or PRKS or VAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 46β versus Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation's 1. 68β — meaning VAC is approximately 15% more volatile than PRKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 8% for ClubCorp Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYCC or PRKS or VAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ClubCorp Holdings, Inc.
(MYCC) is pulling ahead at 3. 4% versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ClubCorp Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 136. 9% year-over-year, compared to -257. 4% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MYCC leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYCC or PRKS or VAC?
United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 1% net margin versus -6. 1% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRKS leads at 22. 3% versus 8. 4% for MYCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MYCC leads at 90. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYCC or PRKS or VAC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRKS: 21. 0% to $49. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYCC or PRKS or VAC?
In this comparison, VAC (3.
5% yield) pays a dividend. MYCC, PRKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MYCC or PRKS or VAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3.
5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VAC: +77. 3%, MYCC: +30. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYCC and PRKS and VAC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MYCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock; VAC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. VAC pays a dividend while MYCC, PRKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.