Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
NAK logo
NAK
SCCO logo
SCCO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAK vs SCCO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.+42.7%
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$156.78B
5Y Perf.+401.3%

NAK vs SCCO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAK logoNAK
SCCO logoSCCO
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsCopper
Market Cap$1.14B$156.78B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$13.42B
Net Income (TTM)$-40M$4.33B
Gross Margin56.7%
Operating Margin52.2%
Forward P/E26.2x
Total Debt$3M$7.41B
Cash & Equiv.$55M$4.30B

NAK vs SCCOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAK
SCCO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Northern Dynasty Mi… (NAK)100142.7+42.7%
Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO)100501.3+401.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAK vs SCCO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SCCO leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇SCCO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
The Growth Leader

NAK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 43.8% revenue growth vs SCCO's 17.4%
Best for: growth
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
The Income Pick

SCCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.31, yield 1.6%
  • Rev growth 17.4%, EPS growth 24.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
  • 7.6% 10Y total return vs NAK's 5.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNAK logoNAK43.8% revenue growth vs SCCO's 17.4%
Quality / MarginsSCCO logoSCCO32.3% margin vs NAK's -0.3%
Stability / SafetySCCO logoSCCOBeta 2.31 vs NAK's 2.42
DividendsSCCO logoSCCO1.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SCCO logoSCCO+104.8% vs NAK's +65.9%
Efficiency (ROA)SCCO logoSCCO21.4% ROA vs NAK's -32.3%, ROIC 38.6% vs -68.7%

NAK vs SCCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Critical Minerals Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Critical Minerals Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
NAKNorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

SCCOSouthern Copper Corporation
FY 2025
Copper
74.8%$10.0B
Molybdenum
10.5%$1.4B
Silver
7.3%$974M
Zinc
3.9%$530M
Other
3.6%$477M

NAK vs SCCO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSCCOLAGGINGNAK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NAK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

SCCO and NAK operate at a comparable scale, with $13.4B and $0 in trailing revenue.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$13.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$22M$7.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$40M$4.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$23M$3.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+56.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+52.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+32.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+146.8%+54.5%
NAK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — NAK and SCCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$156.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$159.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-15.01x36.22x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.26.16x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.73x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.32x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue11.68x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share88.49x14.33x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF45.75x
Evenly matched — NAK and SCCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-99 for NAK. NAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs NAK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-98.8%+42.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-32.3%+21.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-68.7%+38.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-40.1%+39.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–928
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.67x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$52M$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$55M$4.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$7.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-74.40x19.33x
SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — NAK and SCCO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NAK five years ago would be worth $37,004 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $33,068 for SCCO. Over the past 12 months, SCCO leads with a +104.8% total return vs NAK's +65.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NAK at 110.7% vs SCCO's 43.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.6%+29.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+65.9%+104.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+834.9%+197.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+270.0%+230.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+514.1%+762.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+110.7%+43.8%
Evenly matched — NAK and SCCO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SCCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SCCO is the less volatile stock with a 2.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAK's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCCO currently trades 84.8% from its 52-week high vs NAK's 68.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.42x2.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.98$223.89
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.73$87.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+68.5%+84.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.449.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7.9M1.3M
SCCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates NAK as "Buy" and SCCO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -17.7% upside for SCCO (target: $156) vs -36.3% for NAK (target: $1). SCCO is the only dividend payer here at 1.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$1.30$156.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts530
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.96
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). NAK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallSouthern Copper Corporation (SCCO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAK vs SCCO: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAK or SCCO a better buy right now?

Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) offers the better valuation at 36.

2x trailing P/E (26. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — NAK or SCCO?

Over the past 5 years, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

(NAK) delivered a total return of +270. 0%, compared to +230. 7% for Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCO returned +762. 4% versus NAK's +514. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — NAK or SCCO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the lower-risk stock at 2.

31β versus Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. 's 2. 42β — meaning NAK is approximately 5% more volatile than SCCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — NAK or SCCO?

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern Copper Corporation grew EPS 24.

5% year-over-year, compared to -182. 7% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — NAK or SCCO?

Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 0. 0% for NAK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is NAK or SCCO more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SCCO: -17.

7% to $156. 17.

07

Which pays a better dividend — NAK or SCCO?

In this comparison, SCCO (1.

6% yield) pays a dividend. NAK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is NAK or SCCO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

6% yield, +762. 4% 10Y return). Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCO: +762. 4%, NAK: +514. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between NAK and SCCO?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock. SCCO pays a dividend while NAK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.