Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
NAKA logo
NAKA
OPRX logo
OPRX
TALK logo
TALK
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAKA vs OPRX vs TALK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAKA
Nakamoto Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$79M
5Y Perf.-96.3%
OPRX
OptimizeRx Corporation

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.-55.9%
TALK
Talkspace, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$871M
5Y Perf.+98.5%

NAKA vs OPRX vs TALK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAKA logoNAKA
OPRX logoOPRX
TALK logoTALK
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesMedical - Care Facilities
Market Cap$79M$100M$871M
Revenue (TTM)$4M$107M$238M
Net Income (TTM)$-290M$7M$1M
Gross Margin-376.0%69.0%42.2%
Operating Margin-82.2%13.6%-1.2%
Forward P/E5.6x37.0x
Total Debt$210M$26M$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$23M$23M$37M

NAKA vs OPRX vs TALKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAKA
OPRX
TALK
StockMay 24Jun 26Return
Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA)1003.7-96.3%
OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX)10044.1-55.9%
Talkspace, Inc. (TALK)100198.5+98.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAKA vs OPRX vs TALK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: OPRX and TALK are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Talkspace, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NAKA
Nakamoto Inc.
The Secondary Option

NAKA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: financial services exposure
OPRX
OptimizeRx Corporation
The Income Pick

OPRX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.18
  • 56.9% 10Y total return vs TALK's -48.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.18, Low D/E 20.3%, current ratio 3.04x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
TALK
Talkspace, Inc.
The Growth Play

TALK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 22.0%, EPS growth -78.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.2%
  • Beta 0.73, current ratio 6.38x
  • 22.0% revenue growth vs NAKA's -33.0%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTALK logoTALK22.0% revenue growth vs NAKA's -33.0%
ValueOPRX logoOPRXLower P/E (5.6x vs 37.0x)
Quality / MarginsOPRX logoOPRX6.4% margin vs NAKA's -74.0%
Stability / SafetyTALK logoTALKBeta 0.73 vs NAKA's 2.88
DividendsTieNone of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TALK logoTALK+85.1% vs NAKA's -99.3%
Efficiency (ROA)OPRX logoOPRX4.0% ROA vs NAKA's -56.5%, ROIC 6.8% vs -42.1%

NAKA vs OPRX vs TALK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NAKANakamoto Inc.
FY 2025
Product Retail Sales
100.0%$1,479
OPRXOptimizeRx Corporation
FY 2025
Other Revenue
100.0%$215,000
TALKTalkspace, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NAKA vs OPRX vs TALK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOPRXLAGGINGNAKA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

OPRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

TALK is the larger business by revenue, generating $238M annually — 60.8x NAKA's $4M. OPRX is the more profitable business, keeping 6.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAKA's -74.0%. On growth, NAKA holds the edge at +3.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…TALK logoTALKTalkspace, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4M$107M$238M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$320M$19M$2M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$290M$7M$1M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$46M$14M-$6M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-3.8%+69.0%+42.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-82.2%+13.6%-1.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-74.0%+6.4%+0.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.7%+13.4%-2.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.6%-9.5%+18.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-88.4%+78.0%
OPRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OPRX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 19.7x trailing earnings, OPRX trades at a 85% valuation discount to TALK's 130.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OPRX's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TALK's 138.3x.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…TALK logoTALKTalkspace, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$79M$100M$871M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$266M$103M$834M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.43x19.70x130.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.65x36.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.26x138.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue43.19x0.91x3.81x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.10x0.79x7.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.35x
OPRX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

OPRX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

OPRX delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-85 for NAKA. OPRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAKA's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPRX scores 7/9 vs NAKA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…TALK logoTALKTalkspace, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-84.8%+5.5%+1.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-56.5%+4.0%+0.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-42.1%+6.8%+3.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-76.2%+7.8%+2.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9276
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.41x0.20x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$187M$3M-$37M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$23M$23M$37M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$210M$26M$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-24.72x2.84x1.89x
OPRX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TALK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TALK five years ago would be worth $5,268 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $374 for NAKA. Over the past 12 months, TALK leads with a +85.1% total return vs NAKA's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TALK at 62.1% vs NAKA's -66.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…TALK logoTALKTalkspace, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-72.3%-57.2%+48.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.3%-61.4%+85.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.3%-64.6%+326.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.3%-89.8%-47.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.3%+56.9%-48.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-66.6%-29.2%+62.1%
TALK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TALK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TALK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAKA's 2.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TALK currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs NAKA's 0.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…TALK logoTALKTalkspace, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.88x2.18x0.73x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$679.20$22.25$5.23
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.38$4.57$2.22
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.7%+23.9%+99.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.446.156.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded274K442K1.5M
TALK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

OPRX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NAKA as "Buy", OPRX as "Buy", TALK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 219.5% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs 1.0% for TALK (target: $5).

MetricNAKA logoNAKANakamoto Inc.OPRX logoOPRXOptimizeRx Corpor…TALK logoTALKTalkspace, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.00$17.00$5.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts21510
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.4%0.0%+2.0%
OPRX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

OPRX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TALK leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallOptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAKA vs OPRX vs TALK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAKA or OPRX or TALK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Talkspace, Inc.

(TALK) is the stronger pick with 22. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 0% for Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (5. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NAKA or OPRX or TALK?

On trailing P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) is the cheapest at 19.

7x versus Talkspace, Inc. at 130. 0x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NAKA or OPRX or TALK?

Over the past 5 years, Talkspace, Inc.

(TALK) delivered a total return of -47. 3%, compared to -96. 3% for Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OPRX returned +56. 9% versus NAKA's -96. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NAKA or OPRX or TALK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Talkspace, Inc.

(TALK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Nakamoto Inc. 's 2. 88β — meaning NAKA is approximately 292% more volatile than TALK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 41% for Nakamoto Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NAKA or OPRX or TALK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Talkspace, Inc.

(TALK) is pulling ahead at 22. 0% versus -33. 0% for Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OptimizeRx Corporation grew EPS 124. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1452. 2% for Nakamoto Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TALK leads at 24. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NAKA or OPRX or TALK?

OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

7% net margin versus -28. 7% for Nakamoto Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OPRX leads at 11. 0% versus -108. 2% for NAKA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OPRX leads at 63. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NAKA or OPRX or TALK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 5.

6x forward P/E versus 37. 0x for Talkspace, Inc. — 31. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 219. 5% to $17. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NAKA or OPRX or TALK?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is NAKA or OPRX or TALK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Talkspace, Inc.

(TALK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73)). Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) carries a higher beta of 2. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TALK: -48. 5%, NAKA: -96. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NAKA and OPRX and TALK?

These companies operate in different sectors (NAKA (Financial Services) and OPRX (Healthcare) and TALK (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NAKA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; TALK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.