Financial - Capital Markets
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NAKA vs OPRX vs TALK vs DOCS vs TDOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
NAKA vs OPRX vs TALK vs DOCS vs TDOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $79M | $100M | $871M | $3.87B | $1.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $107M | $238M | $645M | $2.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-290M | $7M | $1M | $196M | $-171M |
| Gross Margin | -376.0% | 69.0% | 42.2% | 89.1% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | -82.2% | 13.6% | -1.2% | 33.3% | -7.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.6x | 37.0x | 14.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $210M | $26M | $0.00 | $10M | $1.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $23M | $37M | $219M | $781M |
NAKA vs OPRX vs TALK vs DOCS vs TDOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX) | 100 | 44.1 | -55.9% |
| Talkspace, Inc. (TALK) | 100 | 198.5 | +98.5% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 74.6 | -25.4% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 66.4 | -33.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAKA vs OPRX vs TALK vs DOCS vs TDOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NAKA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
OPRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.18
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 124.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.6%
- 56.9% 10Y total return vs TALK's -48.5%
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 14.4x)
TALK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.73, current ratio 6.38x
- 22.0% revenue growth vs NAKA's -33.0%
- Beta 0.73 vs NAKA's 2.88
- +85.1% vs NAKA's -99.3%
DOCS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 6.09x
- 30.4% margin vs NAKA's -74.0%
- 16.5% ROA vs NAKA's -56.5%, ROIC 19.8% vs -42.1%
Among these 5 stocks, TDOC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.0% revenue growth vs NAKA's -33.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.4% margin vs NAKA's -74.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs NAKA's 2.88 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +85.1% vs NAKA's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.5% ROA vs NAKA's -56.5%, ROIC 19.8% vs -42.1% |
NAKA vs OPRX vs TALK vs DOCS vs TDOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NAKA vs OPRX vs TALK vs DOCS vs TDOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories
TALK leads 2 • TDOC leads 1 • OPRX leads 1 • NAKA leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 641.5x NAKA's $4M. DOCS is the more profitable business, keeping 30.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAKA's -74.0%. On growth, NAKA holds the edge at +3.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $107M | $238M | $645M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$320M | $19M | $2M | $227M | $42M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$290M | $7M | $1M | $196M | -$171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$46M | $14M | -$6M | $215M | $251M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +69.0% | +42.2% | +89.1% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -82.2% | +13.6% | -1.2% | +33.3% | -7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -74.0% | +6.4% | +0.5% | +30.4% | -6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.7% | +13.4% | -2.7% | +33.3% | +10.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | -9.5% | +18.2% | +5.1% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.4% | +78.0% | — | -67.7% | +32.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TDOC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, OPRX trades at a 85% valuation discount to TALK's 130.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OPRX's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TALK's 138.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $79M | $100M | $871M | $3.9B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $266M | $103M | $834M | $3.7B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.43x | 19.70x | 130.00x | 21.10x | -6.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.65x | 36.96x | 14.43x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.40x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.26x | 138.33x | 17.02x | 16.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 43.19x | 0.91x | 3.81x | 6.00x | 0.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.10x | 0.79x | 7.72x | 4.33x | 0.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.35x | — | — | 4.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS delivers a 19.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-85 for NAKA. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TDOC's 0.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPRX scores 7/9 vs NAKA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -84.8% | +5.5% | +1.0% | +19.4% | -12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -56.5% | +4.0% | +0.9% | +16.5% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.1% | +6.8% | +3.9% | +19.8% | -11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -76.2% | +7.8% | +2.7% | +20.7% | -10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.20x | — | 0.01x | 0.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $187M | $3M | -$37M | -$209M | $259M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $23M | $37M | $219M | $781M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $210M | $26M | $0 | $10M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -24.72x | 2.84x | 1.89x | — | -8.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TALK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TALK five years ago would be worth $5,268 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $374 for NAKA. Over the past 12 months, TALK leads with a +85.1% total return vs NAKA's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TALK at 62.1% vs NAKA's -66.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -72.3% | -57.2% | +48.1% | -52.2% | +5.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.3% | -61.4% | +85.1% | -63.0% | +6.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | -64.6% | +326.2% | -36.1% | -70.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | -89.8% | -47.3% | -61.0% | -95.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +56.9% | -48.5% | -61.0% | -42.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -66.6% | -29.2% | +62.1% | -13.9% | -33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
TALK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TALK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAKA's 2.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TALK currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs NAKA's 0.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.88x | 2.18x | 0.73x | 0.75x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $679.20 | $22.25 | $5.23 | $76.51 | $9.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.38 | $4.57 | $2.22 | $17.16 | $4.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.7% | +23.9% | +99.4% | +27.0% | +76.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.4 | 46.1 | 56.8 | 40.8 | 59.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 274K | 442K | 1.5M | 3.9M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
OPRX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NAKA as "Buy", OPRX as "Buy", TALK as "Hold", DOCS as "Hold", TDOC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 219.5% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs -0.8% for TDOC (target: $7).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $17.00 | $5.25 | $29.47 | $7.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 15 | 10 | 23 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | +2.0% | +11.2% | 0.0% |
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TALK leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
NAKA vs OPRX vs TALK vs DOCS vs TDOC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAKA or OPRX or TALK or DOCS or TDOC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Talkspace, Inc.
(TALK) is the stronger pick with 22. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 0% for Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (5. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NAKA or OPRX or TALK or DOCS or TDOC?
On trailing P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) is the cheapest at 19.
7x versus Talkspace, Inc. at 130. 0x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NAKA or OPRX or TALK or DOCS or TDOC?
Over the past 5 years, Talkspace, Inc.
(TALK) delivered a total return of -47. 3%, compared to -96. 3% for Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OPRX returned +56. 9% versus NAKA's -96. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NAKA or OPRX or TALK or DOCS or TDOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Talkspace, Inc.
(TALK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Nakamoto Inc. 's 2. 88β — meaning NAKA is approximately 292% more volatile than TALK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 75% for Teladoc Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NAKA or OPRX or TALK or DOCS or TDOC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Talkspace, Inc.
(TALK) is pulling ahead at 22. 0% versus -33. 0% for Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OptimizeRx Corporation grew EPS 124. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1452. 2% for Nakamoto Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TALK leads at 24. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NAKA or OPRX or TALK or DOCS or TDOC?
Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 4% net margin versus -28. 7% for Nakamoto Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 33. 3% versus -108. 2% for NAKA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 89. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NAKA or OPRX or TALK or DOCS or TDOC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 5.
6x forward P/E versus 37. 0x for Talkspace, Inc. — 31. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 219. 5% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NAKA or OPRX or TALK or DOCS or TDOC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NAKA or OPRX or TALK or DOCS or TDOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Talkspace, Inc.
(TALK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73)). Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) carries a higher beta of 2. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TALK: -48. 5%, NAKA: -96. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NAKA and OPRX and TALK and DOCS and TDOC?
These companies operate in different sectors (NAKA (Financial Services) and OPRX (Healthcare) and TALK (Healthcare) and DOCS (Healthcare) and TDOC (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NAKA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; TALK is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOCS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.