NB
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$773M
5Y Perf.+0.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NB vs UUUU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
Uranium
Market Cap$5.83B
5Y Perf.+321.1%
NB vs UUUU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NB | UUUU |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Uranium |
| Market Cap | $773M | $5.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $85M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-55M | $-70M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -108.3% |
| Total Debt | $131K | $676M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $65M |
NB vs UUUU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NB
UUUU
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NioCorp Development… (NB) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
| Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) | 100 | 421.1 | +321.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NB vs UUUU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NB leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Energy Fuels Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NB
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
The Income Pick
NB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.50
- EPS growth -16.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.50, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 14.12x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
UUUU is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs NB's -15.5%
- +409.8% vs NB's +156.0%
- -6.5% ROA vs NB's -15.9%, ROIC -8.5% vs -148.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NB | 150.8% revenue growth vs UUUU's -15.6% |
| Quality / Margins | NB | 0.1% margin vs UUUU's -82.7% |
| Stability / Safety | NB | Beta 1.50 vs UUUU's 1.85, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | UUUU | +409.8% vs NB's +156.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | UUUU | -6.5% ROA vs NB's -15.9%, ROIC -8.5% vs -148.0% |
NB vs UUUU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLUUUULAGGINGNB
NBNioCorp Developments …
0leads
UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NBMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
—
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
UUUU2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
UUUU6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UUUU and NB operate at a comparable scale, with $85M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | NBNioCorp Developme… | UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $85M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | -$94M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$55M | -$70M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$30M | -$87M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +37.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -108.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -82.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -102.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +112.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +69.2% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
UUUU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NBNioCorp Developme… | UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $773M | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $748M | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.78x | -63.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 88.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.89x | 8.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
UUUU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NB and UUUU each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UUUU delivers a -10.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-10 in annual profit, vs $-18 for NB. NB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UUUU's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NB scores 4/9 vs UUUU's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | NBNioCorp Developme… | UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.0% | -10.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.9% | -6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -148.0% | -8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.8% | -10.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | $611M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $65M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $131,000 | $676M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -249.13x | — |
Evenly matched — NB and UUUU each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UUUU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UUUU five years ago would be worth $39,363 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,454 for NB. Over the past 12 months, UUUU leads with a +409.8% total return vs NB's +156.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UUUU at 57.2% vs NB's 2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NBNioCorp Developme… | UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.6% | +40.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.0% | +409.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.7% | +288.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.5% | +293.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.5% | +983.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.2% | +57.2% |
UUUU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NB and UUUU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NB is the less volatile stock with a 1.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UUUU's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UUUU currently trades 84.2% from its 52-week high vs NB's 50.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NBNioCorp Developme… | UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.58 | $27.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.17 | $4.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.9% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.5M | 9.8M |
Evenly matched — NB and UUUU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NB as "Buy" and UUUU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.1% upside for NB (target: $9) vs 2.5% for UUUU (target: $24).
| Metric | NBNioCorp Developme… | UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.35 | $24.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
UUUU leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallEnergy Fuels Inc. (UUUU)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NB vs UUUU: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NB or UUUU a better buy right now?
Analysts rate NioCorp Developments Ltd.
(NB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NB or UUUU?
Over the past 5 years, Energy Fuels Inc.
(UUUU) delivered a total return of +293. 6%, compared to -15. 5% for NioCorp Developments Ltd. (NB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UUUU returned +983. 0% versus NB's -15. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NB or UUUU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NioCorp Developments Ltd.
(NB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 50β versus Energy Fuels Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning UUUU is approximately 23% more volatile than NB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NioCorp Developments Ltd. (NB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 99% for Energy Fuels Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NB or UUUU?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NioCorp Developments Ltd.
grew EPS -16. 1% year-over-year, compared to -32. 1% for Energy Fuels Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NB or UUUU?
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
(NB) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -129. 9% for Energy Fuels Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NB leads at 0. 0% versus -153. 4% for UUUU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UUUU leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NB or UUUU?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NB or UUUU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Energy Fuels Inc.
(UUUU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+983. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UUUU: +983. 0%, NB: -15. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NB and UUUU?
These companies operate in different sectors (NB (Basic Materials) and UUUU (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.