Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NCT vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
NCT vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $3M | $825.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26M | $270.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $58.03B |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 58.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.9% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $751.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $469.32B |
NCT vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercont (Cayman) … (NCT) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 124.9 | +24.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCT vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NCT is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (0.8x vs 13.8x)
- 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7%
- 4.3% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 9.1% vs 5.4%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 1.7%
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 21.7%
- 461.3% 10Y total return vs NCT's -98.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% NII/revenue growth vs NCT's -21.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs NCT's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs NCT's 2.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.2% vs NCT's -96.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 9.1% vs 5.4% |
NCT vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NCT vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 10608.0x NCT's $26M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCT's 12.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26M | $270.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $81.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $58.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$119.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +58.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | -15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NCT leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.8x trailing earnings, NCT trades at a 95% valuation discount to JPM's 15.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NCT's 2.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 13.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $825.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $1.11T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.85x | 15.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.18x | 13.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 3.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 2.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.43x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NCT leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NCT delivers a 21.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $16 for JPM. JPM carries lower financial leverage with a 2.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCT's 2.41x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.7% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.5% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.41x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23M | $281.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $469.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $751.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.16x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,430 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $161 for NCT. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +25.2% total return vs NCT's -96.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.9% vs NCT's -74.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.1% | -5.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.7% | +25.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +134.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +104.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | +461.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.7% | +32.9% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCT's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs NCT's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.11x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $133.75 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $248.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.1% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 59.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 256K | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NCT and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, NCT offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs JPM's 1.68%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $11.93 | $5.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NCT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
NCT vs JPM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCT or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 3% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT). Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT) offers the better valuation at 0. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NCT or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT) is the cheapest at 0.
8x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 15. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NCT or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +104. 3%, compared to -98. 4% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +461. 3% versus NCT's -98. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NCT or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares's 2. 11β — meaning NCT is approximately 110% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NCT or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus -21. 3% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to -70. 5% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NCT or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 12. 3% for Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27. 7% versus 19. 9% for NCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 58. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — NCT or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 1. 7% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
08Is NCT or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 1. 7% yield, +461. 3% 10Y return). Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NCT) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +461. 3%, NCT: -98. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NCT and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (NCT (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare JPM vs BAC
BAC is one of the most direct listed alternatives to JPM.
Compare NCT vs GS
Compare NCT against another closely matched public peer instead of a generic same-sector name.
Expand With GS + MS
GS and MS are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.