Information Technology Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NIQ vs VRSK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
NIQ vs VRSK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $2.44B | $24.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.31B | $3.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-335M | $910M |
| Gross Margin | 52.2% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 44.9% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 24.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.87B | $5.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $519M | $2.18B |
NIQ vs VRSK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIQ Global Intellig… (NIQ) | 100 | 44.8 | -55.2% |
| Verisk Analytics, I… (VRSK) | 100 | 65.9 | -34.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NIQ vs VRSK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NIQ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth 60.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, current ratio 1.03x
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 24.0x)
VRSK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 1.0%
- 144.6% 10Y total return vs NIQ's -56.5%
- Beta -0.15, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.20x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.6% revenue growth vs NIQ's 5.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 24.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs NIQ's -7.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (316.1% vs 16.3%) | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -40.9% vs NIQ's -56.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.7% ROA vs NIQ's -4.9%, ROIC 33.0% vs 2.3% |
NIQ vs VRSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NIQ vs VRSK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRSK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NIQ and VRSK operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $3.1B in trailing revenue. VRSK is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NIQ's -7.8%. On growth, NIQ holds the edge at +11.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $825M | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$335M | $910M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $115M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.2% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +44.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +36.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +3.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.7% | +4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NIQ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NIQ's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VRSK's 16.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $24.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $26.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.27x | 28.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.48x | 24.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.49x | 16.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 7.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.80x | 82.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 102.12x | 20.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRSK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRSK delivers a 4.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-42 for NIQ. NIQ carries lower financial leverage with a 3.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRSK's 16.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NIQ scores 6/9 vs VRSK's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -41.9% | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.9% | +16.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +33.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +39.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.16x | 16.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $519M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $5.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.59x | 7.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VRSK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VRSK five years ago would be worth $11,031 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,350 for NIQ. Over the past 12 months, VRSK leads with a -40.9% total return vs NIQ's -56.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VRSK at -4.9% vs NIQ's -24.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.6% | -16.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.5% | -40.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.5% | -13.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.5% | +10.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.5% | +144.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.2% | -4.9% |
Risk & Volatility
VRSK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRSK is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NIQ's 0.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRSK currently trades 58.4% from its 52-week high vs NIQ's 40.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.39 | $314.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.93 | $156.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.6% | +58.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.4 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
VRSK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NIQ as "Buy" and VRSK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 74.1% upside for NIQ (target: $14) vs 25.8% for VRSK (target: $231). VRSK is the only dividend payer here at 0.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.40 | $231.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.6% |
VRSK leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NIQ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NIQ vs VRSK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NIQ or VRSK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the stronger pick with 6. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ). Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK) offers the better valuation at 28. 3x trailing P/E (24. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NIQ or VRSK?
On forward P/E, NIQ Global Intelligence Plc is actually cheaper at 8.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NIQ or VRSK?
Over the past 5 years, Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) delivered a total return of +10. 3%, compared to -56. 5% for NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRSK returned +144. 6% versus NIQ's -56. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NIQ or VRSK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 15β versus NIQ Global Intelligence Plc's 0. 85β — meaning NIQ is approximately -671% more volatile than VRSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 16% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NIQ or VRSK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is pulling ahead at 6. 6% versus 5. 7% for NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NIQ Global Intelligence Plc grew EPS 60. 1% year-over-year, compared to -3. 3% for Verisk Analytics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NIQ leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NIQ or VRSK?
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -8. 4% for NIQ Global Intelligence Plc — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRSK leads at 44. 6% versus 3. 4% for NIQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRSK leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NIQ or VRSK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NIQ) trades at 8.
5x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NIQ: 74. 1% to $14. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — NIQ or VRSK?
In this comparison, VRSK (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. NIQ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NIQ or VRSK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 15), 1. 0% yield, +144. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRSK: +144. 6%, NIQ: -56. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NIQ and VRSK?
These companies operate in different sectors (NIQ (Technology) and VRSK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
VRSK pays a dividend while NIQ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.