Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
NSTS vs CZWI vs NECB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
NSTS vs CZWI vs NECB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $67M | $203M | $339M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $90M | $157M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-567K | $14M | $44M |
| Gross Margin | 72.5% | 54.7% | 66.1% |
| Operating Margin | -6.6% | 7.0% | 39.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.8x | 7.6x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $52M | $75M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $55M | $119M | $81M |
NSTS vs CZWI vs NECB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS) | 100 | 104.3 | +4.3% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 146.0 | +46.0% |
| Northeast Community… (NECB) | 100 | 216.9 | +116.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NSTS vs CZWI vs NECB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NSTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 86.2%, EPS growth 79.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 41.6%, current ratio 0.34x
- 86.2% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 1.8%
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- +45.6% vs NSTS's +8.2%
NECB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 460.8% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- PEG 0.23 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 4.9% vs NSTS's 2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 86.2% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.23 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NSTS's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs NECB's 0.83 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs NSTS's +8.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NSTS's 0.8% |
NSTS vs CZWI vs NECB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NSTS vs CZWI vs NECB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NSTS leads in 2 of 6 categories
NECB leads 2 • CZWI leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NSTS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NECB is the larger business by revenue, generating $157M annually — 13.1x NSTS's $12M. NECB is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NSTS's -6.6%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $90M | $157M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$266,000 | $9M | $63M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$567,000 | $14M | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $11M | $51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.5% | +54.7% | +66.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +7.0% | +39.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +16.0% | +28.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +75.7% | +11.5% | +32.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +128.7% | +63.0% | +6.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NECB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, NECB trades at a 48% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NECB offers better value at 0.22x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $67M | $203M | $339M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44M | $136M | $333M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -79.69x | 14.44x | 7.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.78x | 7.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.85x | 0.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.28x | 5.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.56x | 2.25x | 2.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 1.09x | 0.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.34x | 19.55x | 6.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NECB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NECB delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-1 for NSTS. NECB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSTS's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NSTS scores 7/9 vs NECB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.7% | +7.8% | +13.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +0.8% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +2.0% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.7% | +0.6% | +16.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.28x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$23M | -$67M | -$6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $55M | $119M | $81M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $52M | $75M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.15x | 0.16x | 1.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NECB five years ago would be worth $22,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,127 for NSTS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs NSTS's +8.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs NSTS's 14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.2% | +21.5% | +9.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.2% | +45.6% | +10.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.8% | +160.0% | +107.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.3% | +71.2% | +120.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.3% | +157.0% | +460.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.9% | +37.5% | +27.6% |
Risk & Volatility
NSTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NSTS is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NECB's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NSTS currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.46x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.06 | $22.62 | $25.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.72 | $12.83 | $19.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +93.2% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 63.7 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 40K | 36K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CZWI and NECB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", NECB as "Hold". For income investors, NECB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 7 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.37 | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +3.1% | +0.5% |
NSTS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). NECB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
NSTS vs CZWI vs NECB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NSTS or CZWI or NECB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NSTS Bancorp, Inc.
(NSTS) is the stronger pick with 86. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NSTS or CZWI or NECB?
On trailing P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NSTS or CZWI or NECB?
Over the past 5 years, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to +1. 3% for NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NECB returned +460. 8% versus NSTS's +1. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NSTS or CZWI or NECB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NSTS Bancorp, Inc.
(NSTS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 83β — meaning NECB is approximately 272% more volatile than NSTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 42% for NSTS Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NSTS or CZWI or NECB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NSTS Bancorp, Inc.
(NSTS) is pulling ahead at 86. 2% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NSTS Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 79. 7% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NSTS or CZWI or NECB?
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus -6. 6% for NSTS Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NECB leads at 39. 6% versus -6. 6% for NSTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NSTS leads at 72. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NSTS or CZWI or NECB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) trades at 7. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — NSTS or CZWI or NECB?
In this comparison, NECB (4.
0% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NSTS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NSTS or CZWI or NECB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, NSTS: +1. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NSTS and CZWI and NECB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NSTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NECB is a small-cap deep-value stock. CZWI, NECB pay a dividend while NSTS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.