Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NVT vs HUBB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
NVT vs HUBB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $27.89B | $26.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.33B | $6.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $492M | $906M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 20.8% |
| Forward P/E | 41.1x | 25.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.56B | $2.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $238M | $483M |
NVT vs HUBB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| nVent Electric plc (NVT) | 100 | 941.0 | +841.0% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 410.3 | +310.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NVT vs HUBB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NVT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.5%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.3%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs HUBB's 413.6%
- 29.5% revenue growth vs HUBB's 3.8%
HUBB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, Low D/E 67.6%, current ratio 1.72x
- Beta 1.38, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.72x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.5% revenue growth vs HUBB's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.5x vs 41.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.1% margin vs NVT's 11.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.38 vs NVT's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs NVT's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +187.4% vs HUBB's +45.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.6% ROA vs NVT's 7.2%, ROIC 17.1% vs 8.9% |
NVT vs HUBB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NVT vs HUBB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBB and NVT operate at a comparable scale, with $6.0B and $4.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.1% (HUBB) to 11.4% (NVT). On growth, NVT holds the edge at +53.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $6.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $848M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $492M | $906M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $387M | $909M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +35.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +20.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +15.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.5% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -59.7% | +8.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HUBB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.4x trailing earnings, HUBB trades at a 24% valuation discount to NVT's 40.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HUBB's 21.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVT's 35.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27.9B | $26.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29.2B | $28.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 40.02x | 30.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 41.07x | 25.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.46x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.43x | 21.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.16x | 4.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.61x | 6.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 75.00x | 30.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBB delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $13 for NVT. NVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HUBB's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUBB scores 7/9 vs NVT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | +11.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +17.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.5% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $238M | $483M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.61x | 16.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVT five years ago would be worth $55,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,328 for HUBB. Over the past 12 months, NVT leads with a +187.4% total return vs HUBB's +45.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVT at 61.6% vs HUBB's 24.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +61.9% | +8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +187.4% | +45.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +322.1% | +91.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +456.8% | +163.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +599.3% | +413.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +61.6% | +24.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVT and HUBB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUBB is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVT's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVT currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs HUBB's 88.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 1.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $174.50 | $565.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.57 | $346.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +88.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 81.3 | 43.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 542K |
Analyst Outlook
HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NVT as "Buy" and HUBB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for HUBB (target: $535) vs -22.3% for NVT (target: $134). For income investors, HUBB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.07% vs NVT's 0.46%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $134.00 | $535.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.79 | $5.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +0.8% |
HUBB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
NVT vs HUBB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NVT or HUBB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, nVent Electric plc (NVT) is the stronger pick with 29.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) offers the better valuation at 30. 4x trailing P/E (25. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate nVent Electric plc (NVT) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NVT or HUBB?
On trailing P/E, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the cheapest at 30.
4x versus nVent Electric plc at 40. 0x. On forward P/E, Hubbell Incorporated is actually cheaper at 25. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NVT or HUBB?
Over the past 5 years, nVent Electric plc (NVT) delivered a total return of +456.
8%, compared to +163. 3% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVT returned +599. 3% versus HUBB's +413. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NVT or HUBB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
38β versus nVent Electric plc's 1. 68β — meaning NVT is approximately 22% more volatile than HUBB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, nVent Electric plc (NVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 68% for Hubbell Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NVT or HUBB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), nVent Electric plc (NVT) is pulling ahead at 29.
5% versus 3. 8% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: nVent Electric plc grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to 15. 1% for Hubbell Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVT leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NVT or HUBB?
nVent Electric plc (NVT) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
2% net margin versus 15. 2% for Hubbell Incorporated — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus 15. 8% for NVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVT leads at 37. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NVT or HUBB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) trades at 25.
5x forward P/E versus 41. 1x for nVent Electric plc — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HUBB: 6. 5% to $535. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — NVT or HUBB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 5% for nVent Electric plc (NVT).
09Is NVT or HUBB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
1% yield, +413. 6% 10Y return). nVent Electric plc (NVT) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBB: +413. 6%, NVT: +599. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NVT and HUBB?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NVT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HUBB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HUBB pays a dividend while NVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.