Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NVT vs HUBB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NVT
nVent Electric plc

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • GB
Market Cap$27.89B
5Y Perf.+841.0%
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$26.71B
5Y Perf.+310.3%

NVT vs HUBB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NVT logoNVT
HUBB logoHUBB
IndustryElectrical Equipment & PartsElectrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$27.89B$26.71B
Revenue (TTM)$4.33B$6.00B
Net Income (TTM)$492M$906M
Gross Margin37.0%35.5%
Operating Margin15.8%20.8%
Forward P/E41.1x25.5x
Total Debt$1.56B$2.61B
Cash & Equiv.$238M$483M

NVT vs HUBBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NVT
HUBB
StockMay 20May 26Return
nVent Electric plc (NVT)100941.0+841.0%
Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB)100410.3+310.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NVT vs HUBB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HUBB leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. nVent Electric plc is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NVT
nVent Electric plc
The Growth Play

NVT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 29.5%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.3%
  • 6.0% 10Y total return vs HUBB's 413.6%
  • 29.5% revenue growth vs HUBB's 3.8%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
The Income Pick

HUBB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 1.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.38, Low D/E 67.6%, current ratio 1.72x
  • Beta 1.38, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.72x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNVT logoNVT29.5% revenue growth vs HUBB's 3.8%
ValueHUBB logoHUBBLower P/E (25.5x vs 41.1x)
Quality / MarginsHUBB logoHUBB15.1% margin vs NVT's 11.4%
Stability / SafetyHUBB logoHUBBBeta 1.38 vs NVT's 1.68
DividendsHUBB logoHUBB1.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs NVT's 0.5%
Momentum (1Y)NVT logoNVT+187.4% vs HUBB's +45.8%
Efficiency (ROA)HUBB logoHUBB11.6% ROA vs NVT's 7.2%, ROIC 17.1% vs 8.9%

NVT vs HUBB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NVTnVent Electric plc
FY 2025
Enclosures Segment
66.6%$2.6B
Electrical and Fastening Solutions Segment
33.4%$1.3B
HUBBHubbell Incorporated
FY 2025
Utility Solutions Segment
62.8%$3.7B
Electrical Segment
37.2%$2.2B

NVT vs HUBB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHUBBLAGGINGNVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HUBB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

HUBB and NVT operate at a comparable scale, with $6.0B and $4.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.1% (HUBB) to 11.4% (NVT). On growth, NVT holds the edge at +53.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNVT logoNVTnVent Electric plcHUBB logoHUBBHubbell Incorpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.3B$6.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$848M$1.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$492M$906M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$387M$909M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.0%+35.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.8%+20.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.4%+15.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.9%+15.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+53.5%+11.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-59.7%+8.3%
HUBB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HUBB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 30.4x trailing earnings, HUBB trades at a 24% valuation discount to NVT's 40.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HUBB's 21.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVT's 35.4x.

MetricNVT logoNVTnVent Electric plcHUBB logoHUBBHubbell Incorpora…
Market CapShares × price$27.9B$26.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$29.2B$28.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS40.02x30.37x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.41.07x25.48x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.46x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple35.43x21.17x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.16x4.57x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.61x6.97x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF75.00x30.53x
HUBB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HUBB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HUBB delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $13 for NVT. NVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HUBB's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUBB scores 7/9 vs NVT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNVT logoNVTnVent Electric plcHUBB logoHUBBHubbell Incorpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.4%+24.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.2%+11.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.9%+17.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.5%+20.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.42x0.68x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.3B$2.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$238M$483M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.6B$2.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.61x16.90x
HUBB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NVT five years ago would be worth $55,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,328 for HUBB. Over the past 12 months, NVT leads with a +187.4% total return vs HUBB's +45.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVT at 61.6% vs HUBB's 24.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNVT logoNVTnVent Electric plcHUBB logoHUBBHubbell Incorpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+61.9%+8.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+187.4%+45.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+322.1%+91.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+456.8%+163.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+599.3%+413.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+61.6%+24.1%
NVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NVT and HUBB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HUBB is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVT's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVT currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs HUBB's 88.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNVT logoNVTnVent Electric plcHUBB logoHUBBHubbell Incorpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.68x1.38x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$174.50$565.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$59.57$346.07
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.8%+88.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10081.343.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.3M542K
Evenly matched — NVT and HUBB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates NVT as "Buy" and HUBB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for HUBB (target: $535) vs -22.3% for NVT (target: $134). For income investors, HUBB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.07% vs NVT's 0.46%.

MetricNVT logoNVTnVent Electric plcHUBB logoHUBBHubbell Incorpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$134.00$535.14
# AnalystsCovering analysts1717
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises212
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.79$5.35
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.9%+0.8%
HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HUBB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallHubbell Incorporated (HUBB)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NVT vs HUBB: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NVT or HUBB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, nVent Electric plc (NVT) is the stronger pick with 29.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) offers the better valuation at 30. 4x trailing P/E (25. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate nVent Electric plc (NVT) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NVT or HUBB?

On trailing P/E, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the cheapest at 30.

4x versus nVent Electric plc at 40. 0x. On forward P/E, Hubbell Incorporated is actually cheaper at 25. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NVT or HUBB?

Over the past 5 years, nVent Electric plc (NVT) delivered a total return of +456.

8%, compared to +163. 3% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVT returned +599. 3% versus HUBB's +413. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NVT or HUBB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

38β versus nVent Electric plc's 1. 68β — meaning NVT is approximately 22% more volatile than HUBB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, nVent Electric plc (NVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 68% for Hubbell Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NVT or HUBB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), nVent Electric plc (NVT) is pulling ahead at 29.

5% versus 3. 8% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: nVent Electric plc grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to 15. 1% for Hubbell Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVT leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NVT or HUBB?

nVent Electric plc (NVT) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

2% net margin versus 15. 2% for Hubbell Incorporated — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus 15. 8% for NVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVT leads at 37. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NVT or HUBB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) trades at 25.

5x forward P/E versus 41. 1x for nVent Electric plc — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HUBB: 6. 5% to $535. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NVT or HUBB?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 5% for nVent Electric plc (NVT).

09

Is NVT or HUBB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

1% yield, +413. 6% 10Y return). nVent Electric plc (NVT) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBB: +413. 6%, NVT: +599. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NVT and HUBB?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NVT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HUBB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HUBB pays a dividend while NVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

NVT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUBB

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NVT and HUBB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NVT: 53.5% · HUBB: 11.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(NVT: 11.4% · HUBB: 15.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(NVT: 40.0x · HUBB: 30.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.