Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NX vs APOG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
NX vs APOG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $916M | $787M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.85B | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-240M | $54M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 22.7% |
| Operating Margin | -10.0% | 6.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $854M | $286M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $40M |
NX vs APOG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quanex Building Pro… (NX) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
| Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG) | 100 | 177.1 | +77.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NX vs APOG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 43.8%, EPS growth -7.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- 23.7% 10Y total return vs APOG's 10.5%
- 43.8% revenue growth vs APOG's 3.2%
APOG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.65x
- Beta 1.25, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.65x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.8% revenue growth vs APOG's 3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 10.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.9% margin vs NX's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs NX's 1.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs NX's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.2% vs APOG's -2.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs NX's -11.7%, ROIC 8.1% vs -8.8% |
NX vs APOG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NX vs APOG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APOG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NX and APOG operate at a comparable scale, with $1.8B and $1.4B in trailing revenue. APOG is the more profitable business, keeping 3.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NX's -13.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$81M | $57M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$240M | $54M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $95M | $95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +22.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.0% | +6.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | +3.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.9% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $916M | $787M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.70x | 14.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.99x | 10.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.50x | 0.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.96x | 8.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APOG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APOG delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NX. APOG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NX's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), APOG scores 7/9 vs NX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.2% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.7% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.8% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.4% | +9.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.18x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $778M | $247M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $854M | $286M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.30x | 5.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APOG five years ago would be worth $11,292 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,802 for NX. Over the past 12 months, NX leads with a +23.2% total return vs APOG's -2.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NX at 2.0% vs APOG's -0.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.1% | -1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.2% | -2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.0% | -0.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.0% | +12.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.7% | +10.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.0% | -0.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NX and APOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
APOG is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NX's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NX currently trades 87.3% from its 52-week high vs APOG's 73.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.98 | $49.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.04 | $30.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.3% | +73.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 53.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 458K | 253K |
Analyst Outlook
APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NX as "Hold" and APOG as "Hold". For income investors, APOG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs NX's 1.61%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $70.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $1.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | +1.9% |
APOG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
NX vs APOG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NX or APOG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is the stronger pick with 43.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG). Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NX or APOG?
On forward P/E, Quanex Building Products Corporation is actually cheaper at 10.
0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NX or APOG?
Over the past 5 years, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
(APOG) delivered a total return of +12. 9%, compared to -22. 0% for Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NX returned +23. 7% versus APOG's +10. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NX or APOG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
(APOG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus Quanex Building Products Corporation's 1. 89β — meaning NX is approximately 51% more volatile than APOG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 118% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NX or APOG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is pulling ahead at 43.
8% versus 3. 2% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apogee Enterprises, Inc. grew EPS -35. 2% year-over-year, compared to -703. 3% for Quanex Building Products Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NX leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NX or APOG?
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
(APOG) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 9% net margin versus -13. 6% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APOG leads at 6. 0% versus -10. 6% for NX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NX leads at 27. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NX or APOG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) trades at 10.
0x forward P/E versus 10. 6x for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — NX or APOG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 6% for Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX).
09Is NX or APOG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
(APOG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 25), 2. 8% yield). Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APOG: +10. 5%, NX: +23. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NX and APOG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NX is a small-cap high-growth stock; APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.