Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NXP vs GS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NXP
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio

Asset Management - Income

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$745M
5Y Perf.-6.3%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$287.62B
5Y Perf.+371.2%

NXP vs GS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NXP logoNXP
GS logoGS
IndustryAsset Management - IncomeFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$745M$287.62B
Revenue (TTM)$10M$126.85B
Net Income (TTM)$41M$16.67B
Gross Margin97.2%41.1%
Operating Margin93.9%14.5%
Forward P/E75.4x15.6x
Total Debt$26M$616.93B
Cash & Equiv.$6M$182.09B

NXP vs GSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NXP
GS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Nuveen Select Tax-F… (NXP)10093.7-6.3%
The Goldman Sachs G… (GS)100471.2+371.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NXP vs GS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NXP
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio
The Banking Pick

NXP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.10
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 3.6%, current ratio 5.01x
  • Beta 0.10, current ratio 5.01x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

GS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 17.0%, EPS growth 77.3%
  • 5.3% 10Y total return vs NXP's 31.9%
  • 17.0% NII/revenue growth vs NXP's -63.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGS logoGS17.0% NII/revenue growth vs NXP's -63.1%
ValueGS logoGSLower P/E (15.6x vs 75.4x)
Quality / MarginsNXP logoNXPEfficiency ratio 0.0% vs GS's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyNXP logoNXPBeta 0.10 vs GS's 1.47, lower leverage
DividendsGS logoGS1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GS logoGS+70.6% vs NXP's +5.3%
Efficiency (ROA)NXP logoNXPEfficiency ratio 0.0% vs GS's 0.3%

NXP vs GS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NXPNuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio

Segment breakdown not available.

GSThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Global Markets
65.3%$34.9B
Investment Management
30.2%$16.1B
Platform Solutions
4.5%$2.4B

NXP vs GS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNXPLAGGINGGS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NXP leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

GS is the larger business by revenue, generating $126.9B annually — 12483.5x NXP's $10M. NXP is the more profitable business, keeping 93.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GS's 11.3%.

MetricNXP logoNXPNuveen Select Tax…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$10M$126.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$21M$23.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$41M$16.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$15.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+97.2%+41.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+93.9%+14.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+93.9%+11.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-118.4%+45.8%
NXP leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

At 22.8x trailing earnings, GS trades at a 70% valuation discount to NXP's 75.4x P/E.

MetricNXP logoNXPNuveen Select Tax…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…
Market CapShares × price$745M$287.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$765M$722.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS75.37x22.84x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.64x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.63x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple34.75x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue73.29x2.27x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.90x2.53x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
GS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NXP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

GS delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for NXP. NXP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GS's 5.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GS scores 4/9 vs NXP's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricNXP logoNXPNuveen Select Tax…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.7%+12.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.4%+0.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.0%+1.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.3%+3.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x5.06x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$6M$434.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$182.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$26M$616.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1462.58x0.31x
NXP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth $26,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,014 for NXP. Over the past 12 months, GS leads with a +70.6% total return vs NXP's +5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GS at 43.5% vs NXP's 3.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNXP logoNXPNuveen Select Tax…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+3.4%+1.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+5.3%+70.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+11.1%+195.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+0.1%+164.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+31.9%+534.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+3.6%+43.5%
GS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NXP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NXP is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GS's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NXP currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs GS's 94.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNXP logoNXPNuveen Select Tax…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.10x1.47x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.65$984.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.73$547.74
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+97.7%+94.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.559.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded146K2.0M
NXP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates NXP as "Hold" and GS as "Hold". GS is the only dividend payer here at 1.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNXP logoNXPNuveen Select Tax…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$995.89
# AnalystsCovering analysts255
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$13.48
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

NXP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).

Best OverallNuveen Select Tax-Free Inco… (NXP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NXP vs GS: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NXP or GS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) is the stronger pick with 17. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 1% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) a "Hold" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NXP or GS?

On trailing P/E, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) is the cheapest at 22. 8x versus Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio at 75. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NXP or GS?

Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) delivered a total return of +164. 4%, compared to +0. 1% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GS returned +534. 3% versus NXP's +31. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NXP or GS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

10β versus The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning GS is approximately 1363% more volatile than NXP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 5% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NXP or GS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) is pulling ahead at 17. 0% versus -63. 1% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. grew EPS 77. 3% year-over-year, compared to -70. 8% for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NXP or GS?

Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is the more profitable company, earning 93.

9% net margin versus 11. 3% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 93. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXP leads at 93. 9% versus 14. 5% for GS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXP leads at 97. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — NXP or GS?

In this comparison, GS (1.

5% yield) pays a dividend. NXP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is NXP or GS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

10)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXP: +31. 9%, GS: +534. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between NXP and GS?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GS is a large-cap high-growth stock. GS pays a dividend while NXP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

NXP

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 56%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GS

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NXP and GS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NXP: -63.1% · GS: 17.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(NXP: 93.9% · GS: 11.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(NXP: 75.4x · GS: 22.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.