OLMA
Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$1.24B
5Y Perf.-70.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OLMA vs RVMD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RVMD
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$32.12B
5Y Perf.+246.3%
OLMA vs RVMD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OLMA | RVMD |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.24B | $32.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-162M | $-1.37B |
| Total Debt | $1M | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $48M | $384M |
OLMA vs RVMD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OLMA
RVMD
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Olema Pharmaceutica… (OLMA) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| Revolution Medicine… (RVMD) | 100 | 346.3 | +246.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OLMA vs RVMD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OLMA leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Revolution Medicines, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OLMA
Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play
OLMA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- EPS growth 15.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 9.95x
- -25.5% revenue growth vs RVMD's -98.6%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
RVMD
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
The Income Pick
RVMD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.08
- 422.7% 10Y total return vs OLMA's -69.0%
- Beta 1.08, current ratio 7.14x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | OLMA | -25.5% revenue growth vs RVMD's -98.6% |
| Quality / Margins | OLMA | 3.0% margin vs RVMD's 2.8% |
| Stability / Safety | RVMD | Beta 1.08 vs OLMA's 1.18 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | RVMD | +303.5% vs OLMA's +230.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OLMA | -38.7% ROA vs RVMD's -59.1%, ROIC -38.2% vs -54.3% |
OLMA vs RVMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2022
OLMA vs RVMD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOLMALAGGINGRVMD
RVMDRevolution Medicines,…
2leads
OLMAOlema Pharmaceuticals…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs RVMDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
OLMA1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
OLMA7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
RVMD6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
RVMD2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OLMA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OLMA and RVMD operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | OLMAOlema Pharmaceuti… | RVMDRevolution Medici… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$178M | -$1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$162M | -$1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$147M | -$1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.5% | -102.7% |
OLMA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OLMA and RVMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | OLMAOlema Pharmaceuti… | RVMDRevolution Medici… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $32.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $31.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.12x | -25.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.76x | 17.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — OLMA and RVMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OLMA leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OLMA delivers a -42.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-43 in annual profit, vs $-83 for RVMD. OLMA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RVMD's 0.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OLMA scores 3/9 vs RVMD's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | OLMAOlema Pharmaceuti… | RVMDRevolution Medici… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -42.9% | -83.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.7% | -59.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.2% | -54.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -40.1% | -53.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$47M | -$225M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $48M | $384M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $159M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -81.62x |
OLMA leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RVMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RVMD five years ago would be worth $52,093 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,182 for OLMA. Over the past 12 months, RVMD leads with a +303.5% total return vs OLMA's +230.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RVMD at 83.5% vs OLMA's 32.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OLMAOlema Pharmaceuti… | RVMDRevolution Medici… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.9% | +91.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +230.2% | +303.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.2% | +518.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.2% | +420.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.0% | +422.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.2% | +83.5% |
RVMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RVMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RVMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OLMA's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RVMD currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs OLMA's 42.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OLMAOlema Pharmaceuti… | RVMDRevolution Medici… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.13 | $155.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.89 | $34.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.0% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.5 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 3.0M |
RVMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OLMA as "Buy" and RVMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 179.8% upside for OLMA (target: $43) vs 2.5% for RVMD (target: $155).
| Metric | OLMAOlema Pharmaceuti… | RVMDRevolution Medici… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.50 | $154.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
OLMA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RVMD leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Best OverallOlema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OLMA vs RVMD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OLMA or RVMD a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(OLMA) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OLMA or RVMD?
Over the past 5 years, Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) delivered a total return of +420. 9%, compared to -28. 2% for Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RVMD returned +422. 7% versus OLMA's -69. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OLMA or RVMD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning OLMA is approximately 9% more volatile than RVMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 10% for Revolution Medicines, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OLMA or RVMD?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 15. 0% year-over-year, compared to -66. 2% for Revolution Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OLMA or RVMD?
Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(OLMA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Revolution Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLMA leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for RVMD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OLMA leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OLMA or RVMD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is OLMA or RVMD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), +422. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RVMD: +422. 7%, OLMA: -69. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OLMA and RVMD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.