OLMA vs SRRK

Analysts rate Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(OLMA) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Scholar Rock Holding Corporation (SRRK) delivered a total return of +59.

1%, compared to -28. 2% for Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SRRK returned +199. 7% versus OLMA's -69. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(OLMA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Scholar Rock Holding Corporation's 1. 31β — meaning SRRK is approximately 11% more volatile than OLMA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OLMA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 44% for Scholar Rock Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

grew EPS 15. 0% year-over-year, compared to -33. 2% for Scholar Rock Holding Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(OLMA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Scholar Rock Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLMA leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for SRRK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OLMA leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Scholar Rock Holding Corporation (SRRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+199.

7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRRK: +199. 7%, OLMA: -69. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.