OMAB
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Market Cap$5.15B
5Y Perf.+202.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OMAB vs BSAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BSAC
Banco Santander-Chile
Banks - Regional
Market Cap$14.85B
5Y Perf.+99.9%
OMAB vs BSAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OMAB | BSAC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $5.15B | $14.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.96B | $4.66T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.34B | $1.05T |
| Gross Margin | 75.6% | 48.8% |
| Operating Margin | 56.0% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $13.59B | $15.88T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.10B | $5.24T |
OMAB vs BSAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OMAB
BSAC
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grupo Aeroportuario… (OMAB) | 100 | 302.5 | +202.5% |
| Banco Santander-Chi… (BSAC) | 100 | 199.9 | +99.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OMAB vs BSAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OMAB leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Banco Santander-Chile is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
OMAB
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.
The Income Pick
OMAB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 5.0%
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 8.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.2%
- 189.2% 10Y total return vs BSAC's 127.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
BSAC
Banco Santander-Chile
The Banking Pick
BSAC is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.8x)
- 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs OMAB's 5.0%
- +36.8% vs OMAB's +22.9%
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | OMAB | 5.9% revenue growth vs BSAC's -5.0% |
| Value | BSAC | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | OMAB | 33.5% margin vs BSAC's 21.9% |
| Stability / Safety | OMAB | Beta 0.62 vs BSAC's 0.94, lower leverage |
| Dividends | BSAC | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs OMAB's 5.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BSAC | +36.8% vs OMAB's +22.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OMAB | 17.6% ROA vs BSAC's 1.6%, ROIC 31.7% vs 4.5% |
OMAB vs BSAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOMABLAGGINGBSAC
BSACBanco Santander-Chile
2leads
OMABGrupo Aeroportuario d…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BSACMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
OMAB5/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BSAC5/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
OMAB9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BSAC4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OMAB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.66T annually — 291.9x OMAB's $16.0B. OMAB is the more profitable business, keeping 33.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BSAC's 21.9%.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | BSACBanco Santander-C… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.0B | $4.66T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.8B | $1.45T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.3B | $1.05T |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.5B | $776.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.6% | +48.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +56.0% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.5% | +21.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.3% | +13.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | -8.2% |
OMAB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BSAC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, BSAC trades at a 100% valuation discount to OMAB's 16.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSAC offers better value at 0.00x vs OMAB's 0.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | BSACBanco Santander-C… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $14.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $26.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.68x | 0.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.77x | 0.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.44x | 0.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.14x | 17.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.58x | 2.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.80x | 0.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.10x | 21.54x |
BSAC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OMAB leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OMAB delivers a 50.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $22 for BSAC. OMAB carries lower financial leverage with a 1.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BSAC's 2.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OMAB scores 6/9 vs BSAC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | BSACBanco Santander-C… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +50.6% | +21.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.6% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +31.7% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.6% | +3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.19x | 2.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.5B | $10.64T |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.1B | $5.24T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.6B | $15.88T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.08x | 0.72x |
OMAB leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BSAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OMAB five years ago would be worth $25,734 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,931 for BSAC. Over the past 12 months, BSAC leads with a +36.8% total return vs OMAB's +22.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSAC at 21.5% vs OMAB's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | BSACBanco Santander-C… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.1% | +5.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | +36.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.7% | +79.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.3% | +59.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +189.2% | +127.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.8% | +21.5% |
BSAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OMAB and BSAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMAB is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BSAC's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BSAC currently trades 83.6% from its 52-week high vs OMAB's 79.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | BSACBanco Santander-C… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $134.99 | $37.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $87.09 | $22.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.0% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.7 | 30.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 94K | 449K |
Evenly matched — OMAB and BSAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OMAB and BSAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OMAB as "Buy" and BSAC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for OMAB (target: $127) vs 6.3% for BSAC (target: $34). For income investors, BSAC offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs OMAB's 5.02%.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | BSACBanco Santander-C… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $127.00 | $33.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.0% | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $92.57 | $484767.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — OMAB and BSAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
OMAB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BSAC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallGrupo Aeroportuario del Cen… (OMAB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OMAB vs BSAC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OMAB or BSAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the stronger pick with 5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC). Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OMAB or BSAC?
On trailing P/E, Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) is the cheapest at 0.
0x versus Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. at 16. 7x. On forward P/E, Banco Santander-Chile is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OMAB or BSAC?
Over the past 5 years, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) delivered a total return of +157. 3%, compared to +59. 3% for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OMAB returned +189. 2% versus BSAC's +127. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OMAB or BSAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus Banco Santander-Chile's 0. 94β — meaning BSAC is approximately 51% more volatile than OMAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 119% versus 3% for Banco Santander-Chile — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OMAB or BSAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is pulling ahead at 5. 9% versus -5. 0% for Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banco Santander-Chile grew EPS 492. 6% year-over-year, compared to 8. 4% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OMAB or BSAC?
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 5% net margin versus 21. 9% for Banco Santander-Chile — meaning it keeps 33. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OMAB leads at 56. 0% versus 26. 7% for BSAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OMAB leads at 75. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OMAB or BSAC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) trades at 0.
0x forward P/E versus 0. 8x for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OMAB: 19. 1% to $127. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OMAB or BSAC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 5. 0% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB).
09Is OMAB or BSAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 62), 5. 0% yield, +189. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMAB: +189. 2%, BSAC: +127. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OMAB and BSAC?
These companies operate in different sectors (OMAB (Industrials) and BSAC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(OMAB: -0.0% · BSAC: -5.0%)Net Margin>
%
(OMAB: 33.5% · BSAC: 21.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(OMAB: 16.7x · BSAC: 0.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.