OMAB
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Market Cap$5.15B
5Y Perf.+202.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
OMAB vs PAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PAC
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Market Cap$10.71B
5Y Perf.+275.4%
OMAB vs PAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | OMAB | PAC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $5.15B | $10.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.96B | $32.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.34B | $10.36B |
| Gross Margin | 75.6% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 56.0% | 54.0% |
| Forward P/E | 0.8x | 1.0x |
| Total Debt | $13.59B | $46.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.10B | $10.45B |
OMAB vs PAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
OMAB
PAC
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grupo Aeroportuario… (OMAB) | 100 | 302.5 | +202.5% |
| Grupo Aeroportuario… (PAC) | 100 | 375.4 | +275.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OMAB vs PAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OMAB leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
OMAB
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.
The Income Pick
OMAB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 5.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, current ratio 1.32x
- PEG 0.02 vs PAC's 0.03
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
PAC
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
The Growth Play
PAC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 12.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.9%
- 215.5% 10Y total return vs OMAB's 189.2%
- 21.4% revenue growth vs OMAB's 5.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PAC | 21.4% revenue growth vs OMAB's 5.9% |
| Value | OMAB | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 1.0x), PEG 0.02 vs 0.03 |
| Quality / Margins | OMAB | 33.5% margin vs PAC's 31.9% |
| Stability / Safety | PAC | Beta 0.59 vs OMAB's 0.62 |
| Dividends | OMAB | 5.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs PAC's 3.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PAC | +23.5% vs OMAB's +22.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OMAB | 17.6% ROA vs PAC's 11.8%, ROIC 31.7% vs 21.9% |
OMAB vs PAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOMABLAGGINGPAC
PACGrupo Aeroportuario d…
2leads
OMABGrupo Aeroportuario d…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PACMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
OMAB5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OMAB7/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
OMAB8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PAC5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
PAC2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
OMAB2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OMAB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $32.5B annually — 2.0x OMAB's $16.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 33.5% (OMAB) to 31.9% (PAC). On growth, OMAB holds the edge at -0.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | PACGrupo Aeroportuar… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.0B | $32.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.8B | $21.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.3B | $10.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.5B | $5.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.6% | +32.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +56.0% | +54.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.5% | +31.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.3% | +18.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.0% | -63.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +3.4% |
OMAB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
OMAB leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, OMAB trades at a 23% valuation discount to PAC's 21.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OMAB offers better value at 0.44x vs PAC's 0.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | PACGrupo Aeroportuar… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $10.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $12.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.68x | 21.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.77x | 1.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.44x | 0.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.14x | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.58x | 5.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.80x | 8.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.10x | 31.66x |
OMAB leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OMAB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OMAB delivers a 50.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $42 for PAC. OMAB carries lower financial leverage with a 1.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAC's 1.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAC scores 8/9 vs OMAB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | PACGrupo Aeroportuar… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +50.6% | +41.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.6% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +31.7% | +21.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.6% | +26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.19x | 1.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.5B | $36.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.1B | $10.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.6B | $46.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.08x | 5.99x |
OMAB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAC five years ago would be worth $26,451 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $25,734 for OMAB. Over the past 12 months, PAC leads with a +23.5% total return vs OMAB's +22.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAC at 15.2% vs OMAB's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | PACGrupo Aeroportuar… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.1% | -4.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | +23.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.7% | +52.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.3% | +164.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +189.2% | +215.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.8% | +15.2% |
PAC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OMAB's 0.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PAC currently trades 83.0% from its 52-week high vs OMAB's 79.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | PACGrupo Aeroportuar… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 0.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $134.99 | $300.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $87.09 | $204.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.0% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.7 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 94K | 131K |
PAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
OMAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OMAB as "Buy" and PAC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for OMAB (target: $127) vs 4.3% for PAC (target: $260). For income investors, OMAB offers the higher dividend yield at 5.02% vs PAC's 3.90%.
| Metric | OMABGrupo Aeroportuar… | PACGrupo Aeroportuar… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $127.00 | $260.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.0% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $92.57 | $168.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
OMAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
OMAB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PAC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallGrupo Aeroportuario del Cen… (OMAB)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
OMAB vs PAC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OMAB or PAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the stronger pick with 21. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB). Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OMAB or PAC?
On trailing P/E, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the cheapest at 16. 7x versus Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. at 21. 8x. On forward P/E, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. is actually cheaper at 0. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. wins at 0. 02x versus Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. 's 0. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OMAB or PAC?
Over the past 5 years, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) delivered a total return of +164. 5%, compared to +157. 3% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAC returned +215. 5% versus OMAB's +189. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OMAB or PAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 59β versus Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. 's 0. 62β — meaning OMAB is approximately 6% more volatile than PAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 119% versus 188% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OMAB or PAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is pulling ahead at 21. 4% versus 5. 9% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. grew EPS 12. 6% year-over-year, compared to 8. 4% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OMAB leads at 10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OMAB or PAC?
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.
A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 5% net margin versus 30. 7% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. — meaning it keeps 33. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OMAB leads at 56. 0% versus 54. 0% for PAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAC leads at 77. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OMAB or PAC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. 's 0. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 1. 0x for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OMAB: 19. 1% to $127. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OMAB or PAC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) offers the highest yield at 5. 0%, versus 3. 9% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. (PAC).
09Is OMAB or PAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.
A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 3. 9% yield, +215. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAC: +215. 5%, OMAB: +189. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OMAB and PAC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OMAB is a small-cap deep-value stock; PAC is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(OMAB: -0.0% · PAC: -63.8%)Net Margin>
%
(OMAB: 33.5% · PAC: 31.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(OMAB: 16.7x · PAC: 21.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.