Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OSPN vs QLYS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
OSPN vs QLYS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $442M | $3.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $246M | $685M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $70M | $201M |
| Gross Margin | 70.5% | 83.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 33.7% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $97M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $250M |
OSPN vs QLYS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OneSpan Inc. (OSPN) | 100 | 58.1 | -41.9% |
| Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) | 100 | 78.8 | -21.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OSPN vs QLYS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OSPN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 2.3%, current ratio 1.50x
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 12.3x)
- 4.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
QLYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.53
- Rev growth 10.1%, EPS growth 17.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- 252.6% 10Y total return vs OSPN's -24.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.1% revenue growth vs OSPN's 0.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 12.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.4% margin vs OSPN's 28.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs OSPN's 1.23 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -20.3% vs QLYS's -28.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.1% ROA vs OSPN's 18.9%, ROIC 47.5% vs 21.7% |
OSPN vs QLYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OSPN vs QLYS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QLYS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QLYS is the larger business by revenue, generating $685M annually — 2.8x OSPN's $246M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 29.4% (QLYS) to 28.5% (OSPN). On growth, QLYS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $246M | $685M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $57M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $70M | $201M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $47M | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.5% | +83.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +33.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +29.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +42.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.9% | +10.1% |
Valuation Metrics
OSPN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.2x trailing earnings, OSPN trades at a 63% valuation discount to QLYS's 16.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OSPN's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than QLYS's 13.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $442M | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $378M | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.21x | 16.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.61x | 12.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.86x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.80x | 13.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.82x | 4.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.67x | 5.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.76x | 10.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS delivers a 37.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $27 for OSPN. OSPN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QLYS's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QLYS scores 6/9 vs OSPN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.3% | +37.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.9% | +19.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.7% | +47.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.6% | +37.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$64M | -$153M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $250M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $97M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1656.95x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OSPN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QLYS five years ago would be worth $9,250 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,861 for OSPN. Over the past 12 months, OSPN leads with a -20.3% total return vs QLYS's -28.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OSPN at -3.3% vs QLYS's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.9% | -30.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.3% | -28.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.5% | -21.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.4% | -7.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.1% | +252.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.3% | -7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OSPN and QLYS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OSPN's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OSPN currently trades 65.1% from its 52-week high vs QLYS's 58.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.13 | $155.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.07 | $74.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.1% | +58.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.1 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 593K | 768K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OSPN as "Buy" and QLYS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.8% upside for QLYS (target: $134) vs 31.4% for OSPN (target: $16). OSPN is the only dividend payer here at 4.07% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.50 | $134.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +5.7% |
QLYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OSPN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
OSPN vs QLYS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OSPN or QLYS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the stronger pick with 10. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 0% for OneSpan Inc. (OSPN). OneSpan Inc. (OSPN) offers the better valuation at 6. 2x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OneSpan Inc. (OSPN) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OSPN or QLYS?
On trailing P/E, OneSpan Inc.
(OSPN) is the cheapest at 6. 2x versus Qualys, Inc. at 16. 7x. On forward P/E, OneSpan Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OSPN or QLYS?
Over the past 5 years, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) delivered a total return of -7. 5%, compared to -51. 4% for OneSpan Inc. (OSPN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QLYS returned +252. 6% versus OSPN's -24. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OSPN or QLYS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus OneSpan Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning OSPN is approximately 132% more volatile than QLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OneSpan Inc. (OSPN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 17% for Qualys, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OSPN or QLYS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is pulling ahead at 10. 1% versus 0. 0% for OneSpan Inc. (OSPN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OneSpan Inc. grew EPS 30. 1% year-over-year, compared to 17. 0% for Qualys, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QLYS leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OSPN or QLYS?
OneSpan Inc.
(OSPN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 0% net margin versus 29. 6% for Qualys, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QLYS leads at 33. 2% versus 20. 6% for OSPN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QLYS leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OSPN or QLYS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OneSpan Inc.
(OSPN) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for Qualys, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QLYS: 47. 8% to $134. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — OSPN or QLYS?
In this comparison, OSPN (4.
1% yield) pays a dividend. QLYS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OSPN or QLYS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), +252. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (QLYS: +252. 6%, OSPN: -24. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OSPN and QLYS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
OSPN pays a dividend while QLYS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.