Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PC vs ARKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
PC vs ARKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $188M | $26M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $162M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-14M |
| Gross Margin | 16.1% | 6.9% |
| Operating Margin | -28.8% | -0.5% |
| Total Debt | $5M | $86M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34K | $11M |
PC vs ARKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Premium Catering (H… (PC) | 100 | 22.0 | -78.0% |
| Ark Restaurants Cor… (ARKR) | 100 | 57.8 | -42.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PC vs ARKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.09
- Rev growth -1.0%, EPS growth -21.1%
- -1.0% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7%
ARKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -36.6% 10Y total return vs PC's -71.9%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.42, current ratio 0.77x
- Beta -0.42, current ratio 0.77x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.0% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | -8.5% margin vs PC's -28.4% | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.8% vs ARKR's -39.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -10.5% ROA vs PC's -20.4%, ROIC -2.6% vs -22.3% |
PC vs ARKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PC vs ARKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PC and ARKR each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $162M annually — 31.3x PC's $5M. ARKR is the more profitable business, keeping -8.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PC's -28.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $162M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +6.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -28.8% | -0.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.4% | -8.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -9.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -71.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PC and ARKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $188M | $26M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $192M | $101M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.68x | -2.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 46.50x | 0.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 403.80x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PC and ARKR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -41.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.4% | -10.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.3% | -2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.1% | -3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | $74M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34,237 | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $86M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.00x | -21.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARKR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARKR five years ago would be worth $4,329 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,808 for PC. Over the past 12 months, PC leads with a +8.8% total return vs ARKR's -39.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARKR at -23.3% vs PC's -34.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.8% | -39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.9% | -54.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.9% | -56.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.9% | -36.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.5% | -23.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PC and ARKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARKR is the less volatile stock with a -0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PC's 0.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PC currently trades 67.1% from its 52-week high vs ARKR's 57.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.09x | -0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.00 | $12.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.11 | $5.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.1% | +57.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 73.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 378K | 5K |
Analyst Outlook
PC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARKR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). PC leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.
PC vs ARKR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PC or ARKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited (PC) is the stronger pick with -1.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PC or ARKR?
Over the past 5 years, Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) delivered a total return of -56. 7%, compared to -71. 9% for Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited (PC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARKR returned -36. 9% versus PC's -71. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PC or ARKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 42β versus Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited's 0. 09β — meaning PC is approximately -122% more volatile than ARKR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — PC or ARKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited (PC) is pulling ahead at -1.
0% versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ark Restaurants Corp. grew EPS -194. 4% year-over-year, compared to -21. 1% for Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PC or ARKR?
Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the more profitable company, earning -6. 9% net margin versus -28. 4% for Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited — meaning it keeps -6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARKR leads at -2. 5% versus -28. 8% for PC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARKR leads at 35. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PC or ARKR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PC or ARKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 42)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARKR: -36. 9%, PC: -71. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PC and ARKR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.