Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PENN vs BYD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
PENN vs BYD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $2.24B | $6.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.96B | $4.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-843M | $1.84B |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.9% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | 22.9x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $8.38B | $3.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $687M | $353M |
PENN vs BYD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
| Boyd Gaming Corpora… (BYD) | 100 | 398.3 | +298.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PENN vs BYD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PENN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth -184.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
- 5.8% revenue growth vs BYD's 4.1%
BYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 0.8%
- 373.2% 10Y total return vs PENN's 13.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, current ratio 0.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs BYD's 4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 22.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.0% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs PENN's 1.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.3% vs PENN's +7.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.9% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 12.3% vs 1.8% |
PENN vs BYD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PENN vs BYD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BYD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PENN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.0B annually — 1.7x BYD's $4.1B. BYD is the more profitable business, keeping 45.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, PENN holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.0B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$105M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$843M | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$169M | $388M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +42.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.1% | +45.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.2% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.5% | -6.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PENN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BYD's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PENN's 13.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $6.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.9B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.87x | 3.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.92x | 11.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.81x | 7.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 1.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 2.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BYD leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BYD delivers a 91.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $92 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. BYD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENN's 4.58x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.7% | +91.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.7% | +27.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +12.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +15.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.58x | 1.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.7B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $687M | $353M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.4B | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.02x | 15.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BYD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BYD five years ago would be worth $13,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,996 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, BYD leads with a +24.3% total return vs PENN's +7.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BYD at 7.5% vs PENN's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.8% | -1.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.9% | +24.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.4% | +24.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | +33.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.6% | +373.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.5% | +7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BYD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYD is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYD currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs PENN's 81.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.61 | $89.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.65 | $68.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.3% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 935K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PENN as "Buy" and BYD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.7% upside for PENN (target: $20) vs 11.6% for BYD (target: $95). BYD is the only dividend payer here at 0.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.88 | $95.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 47 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +15.8% | +12.1% |
BYD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PENN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
PENN vs BYD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PENN or BYD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) offers the better valuation at 3. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PENN or BYD?
On forward P/E, Boyd Gaming Corporation is actually cheaper at 11.
9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PENN or BYD?
Over the past 5 years, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) delivered a total return of +33.
4%, compared to -80. 0% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BYD returned +373. 2% versus PENN's +13. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PENN or BYD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
86β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 56% more volatile than BYD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 125% versus 5% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PENN or BYD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus 4. 1% for Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Boyd Gaming Corporation grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BYD leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PENN or BYD?
Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the more profitable company, earning 45.
0% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BYD leads at 21. 4% versus 3. 9% for PENN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BYD leads at 42. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PENN or BYD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) trades at 11.
9x forward P/E versus 22. 9x for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PENN: 18. 7% to $19. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — PENN or BYD?
In this comparison, BYD (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. PENN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PENN or BYD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Boyd Gaming Corporation (BYD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
86), 0. 8% yield, +373. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYD: +373. 2%, PENN: +13. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PENN and BYD?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BYD is a small-cap deep-value stock. BYD pays a dividend while PENN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.