Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PENN vs MGM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
PENN vs MGM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $2.24B | $9.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.96B | $17.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-843M | $183M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | -7.9% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 23.0x | 22.1x |
| Total Debt | $8.38B | $56.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $687M | $2.06B |
PENN vs MGM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
| MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM) | 100 | 221.8 | +121.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PENN vs MGM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PENN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth -184.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.8%
- 5.8% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7%
MGM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.28
- 81.8% 10Y total return vs PENN's 11.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, current ratio 1.23x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.1x vs 23.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.0% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.28 vs PENN's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.1% vs PENN's +6.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 1.7% vs 1.8% |
PENN vs MGM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PENN vs MGM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 2.5x PENN's $7.0B. MGM is the more profitable business, keeping 1.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, PENN holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.0B | $17.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$105M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$843M | $183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$169M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.1% | +1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.2% | +4.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.5% | -5.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PENN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PENN's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MGM's 31.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.9B | $63.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.88x | 50.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.95x | 22.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.81x | 31.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 0.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PENN and MGM each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGM delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. PENN carries lower financial leverage with a 4.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.7% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.7% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.58x | 17.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.7B | $54.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $687M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.4B | $56.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.02x | 1.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MGM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGM five years ago would be worth $9,551 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, MGM leads with a +20.1% total return vs PENN's +6.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGM at -4.3% vs PENN's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.9% | +4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.7% | +20.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | -12.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.6% | -4.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.9% | +81.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.5% | -4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
MGM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGM is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGM currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs PENN's 81.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.61 | $40.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.65 | $29.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.4% | +93.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.1 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PENN as "Buy" and MGM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.5% upside for PENN (target: $20) vs 4.2% for MGM (target: $40).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.88 | $39.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 47 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +15.8% | +12.6% |
MGM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PENN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PENN vs MGM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PENN or MGM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). MGM Resorts International (MGM) offers the better valuation at 50. 1x trailing P/E (22. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PENN or MGM?
On forward P/E, MGM Resorts International is actually cheaper at 22.
1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PENN or MGM?
Over the past 5 years, MGM Resorts International (MGM) delivered a total return of -4.
5%, compared to -80. 6% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGM returned +81. 8% versus PENN's +11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PENN or MGM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MGM Resorts International (MGM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
28β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 5% more volatile than MGM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PENN or MGM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MGM Resorts International grew EPS -68. 3% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGM leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PENN or MGM?
MGM Resorts International (MGM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
2% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGM leads at 5. 7% versus 3. 9% for PENN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGM leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PENN or MGM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MGM Resorts International (MGM) trades at 22.
1x forward P/E versus 23. 0x for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PENN: 18. 5% to $19. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — PENN or MGM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PENN or MGM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MGM Resorts International (MGM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
28)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGM: +81. 8%, PENN: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PENN and MGM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.