Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PGNY vs LFST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
PGNY vs LFST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $1.53B | $2.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.29B | $1.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $59M | $10M |
| Gross Margin | 23.6% | 30.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.6% | 1.7% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 100.7x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $194M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $112M | $249M |
PGNY vs LFST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) | 100 | 31.7 | -68.3% |
| LifeStance Health G… (LFST) | 100 | 26.4 | -73.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PGNY vs LFST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PGNY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.71
- 17.3% 10Y total return vs LFST's -66.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 2.73x
LFST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.3%
- 13.9% revenue growth vs PGNY's 10.4%
- +12.4% vs PGNY's -19.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% revenue growth vs PGNY's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 100.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.5% margin vs LFST's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs LFST's 1.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.4% vs PGNY's -19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.7% ROA vs LFST's 0.4%, ROIC 18.1% vs 1.2% |
PGNY vs LFST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PGNY vs LFST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PGNY and LFST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LFST and PGNY operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $1.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.5% (PGNY) to 0.7% (LFST). On growth, LFST holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $79M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $59M | $10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $189M | $146M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +30.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +10.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +17.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | +2.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PGNY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 28.8x trailing earnings, PGNY trades at a 92% valuation discount to LFST's 368.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PGNY's 16.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LFST's 34.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.77x | 368.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.00x | 100.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.29x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.00x | 34.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.19x | 2.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.24x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.99x | 25.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PGNY leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PGNY delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $1 for LFST. PGNY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LFST's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LFST scores 7/9 vs PGNY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | +0.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.1% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.4% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | -$55M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $112M | $249M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $194M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LFST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PGNY five years ago would be worth $3,589 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,361 for LFST. Over the past 12 months, LFST leads with a +12.4% total return vs PGNY's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LFST at -4.7% vs PGNY's -18.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.4% | +5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.9% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.3% | -13.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.1% | -66.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.3% | -66.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.7% | -4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PGNY and LFST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PGNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LFST's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LFST currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs PGNY's 65.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.75 | $8.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.10 | $3.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.0% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PGNY as "Buy" and LFST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.7% upside for PGNY (target: $31) vs 26.4% for LFST (target: $9).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.80 | $9.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | 0.0% |
PGNY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LFST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PGNY vs LFST: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PGNY or LFST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LifeStance Health Group, Inc.
(LFST) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for Progyny, Inc. (PGNY). Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) offers the better valuation at 28. 8x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PGNY or LFST?
On trailing P/E, Progyny, Inc.
(PGNY) is the cheapest at 28. 8x versus LifeStance Health Group, Inc. at 368. 0x. On forward P/E, Progyny, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PGNY or LFST?
Over the past 5 years, Progyny, Inc.
(PGNY) delivered a total return of -64. 1%, compared to -66. 4% for LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PGNY returned +17. 3% versus LFST's -66. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PGNY or LFST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Progyny, Inc.
(PGNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus LifeStance Health Group, Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning LFST is approximately 69% more volatile than PGNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Progyny, Inc. (PGNY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 13% for LifeStance Health Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PGNY or LFST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LifeStance Health Group, Inc.
(LFST) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus 10. 4% for Progyny, Inc. (PGNY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LifeStance Health Group, Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to 14. 0% for Progyny, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LFST leads at 18. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PGNY or LFST?
Progyny, Inc.
(PGNY) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 5% net margin versus 0. 7% for LifeStance Health Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PGNY leads at 6. 6% versus 1. 8% for LFST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LFST leads at 28. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PGNY or LFST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Progyny, Inc.
(PGNY) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 100. 7x for LifeStance Health Group, Inc. — 84. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGNY: 64. 7% to $30. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — PGNY or LFST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PGNY or LFST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Progyny, Inc.
(PGNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PGNY: +17. 3%, LFST: -66. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PGNY and LFST?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.